New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

RSA 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for RSA's 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 4
[All 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Questions]

When an administrator selects to cascade private field permissions for a group, which of the following would be a valid result?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Matthew
3 months ago
D sounds like the most logical outcome here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
3 months ago
B seems too restrictive, I don't agree with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
3 months ago
Wait, so C means the selected group has no access? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
4 months ago
Definitely not A, that doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
4 months ago
I think D is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
4 months ago
I’m confused about C because it says members of child groups would have access, but not the selected group. That doesn’t seem right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
4 months ago
I feel like I saw a similar question where child groups had access too, so D might be the right choice after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about only the selected group having access, which makes me lean towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
5 months ago
I think cascading permissions means that access flows down to child groups, so maybe D is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
5 months ago
I think I've got this. Cascading the permissions means they apply to the group and any subgroups. So the correct answer is option D - members of the selected group and any child groups would have access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. If the admin selects to cascade the permissions, then the members of the selected group and any child groups would have access to the field. I'm going with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the question. Does "cascading private field permissions" mean the permissions would apply to the group and any child groups? Or just the group itself? I'll have to re-read this a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Cascading permissions for a group - that means the permissions would apply to the group and any subgroups, right? I'm leaning towards option D, but I want to double-check the wording.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the key is the X-Forwarded-For requirement. That's a common HTTP header, so the virtual server type that's designed for HTTP traffic, Performance (HTTP), is probably the best choice here. The SSL encryption is also supported by that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
1 year ago
I'm picking D, but honestly, who even comes up with these joke options B and C? 'Members would NOT have access' - yeah, right.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
1 year ago
Definitely, D is the safest option to ensure proper access for all group members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
1 year ago
Yeah, D seems like the most logical choice. It ensures that both the selected group and child groups have access to the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
1 year ago
I know, it's pretty confusing. But I think D makes the most sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
1 year ago
I'm picking D, but honestly, who even comes up with these joke options B and C? 'Members would NOT have access' - yeah, right.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stanton
1 year ago
D all the way! Can't believe anyone would think the field access wouldn't cascade to child groups. That's like the whole point of this feature.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
1 year ago
B) Only members of the selected group would have access to the field, members of any child groups would NOT have access to the field
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
D) Members of the selected group and members of any child groups would have access to the field
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
1 year ago
A) Only members of BOTH the selected group and all child groups would have access to the field
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ricarda
1 year ago
I see your point, Socorro. I also think the answer is D because it allows for broader access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
1 year ago
But if we cascade permissions, wouldn't it make sense for both the selected group and child groups to have access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'm going with D. Anything else would just be silly, right?
upvoted 0 times
Britt
1 year ago
Yes, D is the logical choice. It ensures that all relevant members can access the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
1 year ago
I agree, D is the correct option. It makes sense for both the selected group and child groups to have access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
1 year ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
1 year ago
Option D is clearly the correct answer. Cascading permissions should allow access to the field for both the selected group and any child groups.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
1 year ago
Yes, it makes sense that both the selected group and child groups should have access to the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 year ago
I agree, option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
1 year ago
Yes, that's right. It ensures that permissions are cascaded down effectively to all relevant groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
1 year ago
I agree, option D is the correct answer. It makes sense for both the selected group and child groups to have access to the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel