MENU
If a group is associated with an access role and the group contains sub-groups, how will the associated access role affect the sub-groups?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
HA
Haley
11 months ago
I believe they won't be associated at all.
IL
Iluminada
11 months ago
No way, I thought they would be inactivated instead.
MA
Maryann
12 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
HU
Hubert
12 months ago
Totally agree, that's how it usually works!
GL
Glenna
12 months ago
I think the sub-groups will be associated with the access role.
PA
Paris
1 year ago
I think I read that access roles can cascade down to sub-groups, so option C could be the right answer, but I’m not completely confident.
MA
Matt
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where the main group affected the sub-groups, so maybe option C is correct?
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
I think the access role might apply to the sub-groups too, but I'm not entirely sure.
LE
Leonora
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about this one. I feel like the sub-groups should remain unaffected, which makes me lean towards option D.
CA
Carlota
1 year ago
This one seems straightforward - I think the answer is B, since the question states that persuasive evidence of an arrangement doesn't exist when there's no written or verbal agreement.
MA
Margery
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know private and permissioned blockchains have some similarities, but I'm not entirely sure what the shared benefits are. I'll have to think this through carefully.