Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

RSA 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

If a group is associated with an access role and the group contains sub-groups, how will the associated access role affect the sub-groups?
D) The sub-groups will not be associated with the access role.
A) The sub-groups will be inactivated.
B) The sub-groups will be removed from the group.
C) The sub-groups will be associated with the access role.

RSA 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for RSA's 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Questions]

If a group is associated with an access role and the group contains sub-groups, how will the associated access role affect the sub-groups?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Justine at May 07, 2022, 10:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Haley
8 months ago
I believe they won't be associated at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
8 months ago
No way, I thought they would be inactivated instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
9 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
9 months ago
Totally agree, that's how it usually works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
9 months ago
I think the sub-groups will be associated with the access role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
I think I read that access roles can cascade down to sub-groups, so option C could be the right answer, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
9 months ago
I remember a practice question where the main group affected the sub-groups, so maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
I think the access role might apply to the sub-groups too, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about this one. I feel like the sub-groups should remain unaffected, which makes me lean towards option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
9 months ago
This one seems straightforward - I think the answer is B, since the question states that persuasive evidence of an arrangement doesn't exist when there's no written or verbal agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know private and permissioned blockchains have some similarities, but I'm not entirely sure what the shared benefits are. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel