Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
RSA Discussions
Exam 050-11-CARSANWLN01 Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion
RSA Exam 050-11-CARSANWLN01 Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion
Actual exam question for RSA's 050-11-CARSANWLN01 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 5
[All 050-11-CARSANWLN01 Questions]
Which statement about Health and Wellness Alarm Suppression is false?
A
Suppression schedules can be defined for individual rules
B
Suppression schedules can be defined for entire policies
C
Suppression schedules can be applied to out-of-the-box policies
D
Multiple suppression schedules can be defined
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
D
by
Geoffrey
at
Oct 07, 2023, 02:01 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium 050-11-CARSANWLN01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Vonda
15 days ago
C, definitely C. I mean, come on, 'out-of-the-box'? That's like asking for trouble. Suppression schedules and out-of-the-box policies? Nah, that's a hard pass.
upvoted
0
times
...
Hubert
16 days ago
I'm just gonna flip a coin on this one. Health and Wellness Alarm Suppression? More like Health and Wellness Alarm Confusion, am I right?
upvoted
0
times
...
Minna
20 days ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna go with C just to be different. Who knows, maybe the exam writers are trying to trick us!
upvoted
0
times
...
Yoko
1 months ago
A, B, and D all sound plausible, but C just seems too good to be true. That's the one that's gotta be false.
upvoted
0
times
Truman
9 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think A is the false statement.
upvoted
0
times
...
Cristal
29 days ago
I think it's possible to define suppression schedules for entire policies, so maybe B is false.
upvoted
0
times
...
Fausto
30 days ago
I agree, C does sound too good to be true.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Pete
2 months ago
D seems like the right choice to me. Multiple suppression schedules are totally a thing. Gotta cover all your bases, you know?
upvoted
0
times
Chantay
1 months ago
Yes, it's always better to be safe than sorry when it comes to health and wellness alarm suppression.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lizbeth
1 months ago
I agree, having multiple suppression schedules is important to ensure all scenarios are covered.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Cristen
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Suppression schedules can't be applied to out-of-the-box policies. That's just common sense, right?
upvoted
0
times
...
Gilbert
2 months ago
I believe the false statement is D, as only one suppression schedule can be defined.
upvoted
0
times
...
Reynalda
2 months ago
I agree with Mindy, suppression schedules can't be applied to out-of-the-box policies.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mindy
2 months ago
I think the false statement is C.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Vonda
15 days agoHubert
16 days agoMinna
20 days agoYoko
1 months agoTruman
9 days agoCristal
29 days agoFausto
30 days agoPete
2 months agoChantay
1 months agoLizbeth
1 months agoCristen
2 months agoGilbert
2 months agoReynalda
2 months agoMindy
2 months ago