New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Qlik QV12SA Exam - Topic 3 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Qlik's QV12SA exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 3
[All QV12SA Questions]

There is a QlikView document with separate "City" and "State" fields A system administrator needs to create separate QVW documents each with a singular "City and State" field.

Which method should the system administrator use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Gwenn at Aug 23, 2024, 03:14 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium QV12SA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vivienne
3 months ago
Not sure if concatenating is the best approach...
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
3 months ago
I'm surprised they need to create separate docs for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
3 months ago
Wait, why not just use option B? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
4 months ago
Definitely agree with that! Concatenation makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
4 months ago
I think option C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I recall that we discussed how concatenation can sometimes simplify the process. I just can’t remember if it’s required here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
4 months ago
I feel like option C is the best choice since it explicitly mentions concatenating before reducing, which seems necessary for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
4 months ago
I think looping and reducing by 'City and State' makes sense, but I’m a bit confused about whether we need to concatenate first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
5 months ago
I remember we practiced something similar where we had to combine fields, but I'm not sure if concatenating is the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty standard QlikView administration task. I'd go with option C - concatenate the fields and then loop and reduce by the combined "City and State" field. That way, we can create the separate QVW documents with the desired single field structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Does "loop and reduce" mean we need to use some kind of looping or iterative process to create the new documents? I'll have to review my QlikView knowledge to figure out the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to create separate QVW documents with a single "City and State" field, but I'm not sure which method is the best approach. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about QlikView document management. I think the key is to understand how to properly concatenate the "City" and "State" fields to create a single "City and State" field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the answer is C - concatenate the "City" and "State" fields, then loop and reduce by the combined "City and State" field. That seems like the most logical way to achieve the desired result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key here is to minimize operational effort, so I'm leaning towards the Amazon RDS Proxy option (D). That way, we can still use the Aurora MySQL DB but offload the connection management to the proxy. Seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
9 months ago
I'm just picturing the system administrator trying to figure out how to spell 'concatenate' during the exam. That's the real challenge here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
10 months ago
I'm going to have to go with option B. Looping and reducing by 'City and State' just sounds like the most efficient way to handle this. Plus, it's got a nice ring to it, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Jeffrey
8 months ago
I would go with option D, it includes creating a bookmark for 'City and State'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
9 months ago
I think option C could work too, by concatenating 'City' and 'State' first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
9 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marshall
10 months ago
Option D with the bookmark seems a bit overkill. I don't think we need to create a bookmark for this task. C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Sheron
9 months ago
Yeah, creating a bookmark for this task does seem unnecessary. Concatenating 'City' and 'State' then looping and reducing by 'City and State' should work just fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
9 months ago
I think concatenating 'City' and 'State' first before looping and reducing by 'City and State' is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
10 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient method for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristina
10 months ago
I'm not sure why we need to loop and reduce at all. Couldn't we just concatenate the 'City' and 'State' fields and be done with it? That would give us the singular 'City and State' field we're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Alyce
9 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dortha
10 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward. Concatenating the 'City' and 'State' fields and then looping and reducing by the combined 'City and State' field is a logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
10 months ago
Why do you think option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the best method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
10 months ago
I think the system administrator should use option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel