Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 7 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 7
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

A customer map application is built with a containerized micro-service infrastructure that runs on Windows and accesses storage using SMB.

Each container is stateless, but every end user interaction leaves a set of small text and image files. Each directory keeps all daily transaction files. A process exists to manage file life cycle and periodically delete a directory.

The customer notices that as the customer base grows, the background deletion process backlog also grows. Which FlashBlade technology should be used to resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cordelia at Sep 09, 2024, 09:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FBAP_002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Blondell
2 months ago
Reducing resource utilization for the FlashBlade garbage collection sounds like a good idea, but the fast-remove option is probably the most straightforward way to tackle this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
19 days ago
Reducing resource utilization for FlashBlade garbage collection might be worth considering as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
21 days ago
Enabling concurrent data access for NFS and SMB could also help improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
1 months ago
Agreed, it seems like the most straightforward way to handle the growing backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
2 months ago
I think enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB would be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
2 months ago
As a tech-savvy customer, I'd be impressed if the vendor could offer a solution that just makes the file deletion 'disappear' - pun intended!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
2 months ago
I'm curious to know how the fast-remove feature works. Does it somehow optimize the deletion process to handle the increasing number of files?
upvoted 0 times
Van
30 days ago
A: Definitely, it should improve the efficiency of managing file life cycle in the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 months ago
B: That sounds like it could really help with the backlog issue the customer is facing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
2 months ago
A: Fast-remove for NFS and SMB allows for quick deletion of files, optimizing the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angella
2 months ago
Concurrent data access might be overkill for this use case. What we really need is a way to speed up the deletion process, and the fast-remove feature seems to fit the bill.
upvoted 0 times
Yuette
1 months ago
I think enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB is the best option to resolve the backlog issue with the deletion process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
2 months ago
Concurrent data access might not be necessary in this case, fast-remove for NFS and SMB sounds like the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
2 months ago
I agree, enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB should help speed up the deletion process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freeman
3 months ago
The fast-remove option for NFS and SMB sounds like the perfect solution to address the growing backlog issue. Deleting directories efficiently is key here.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
2 months ago
D: Enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB will definitely improve the performance of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 months ago
C: It's important to efficiently handle the deletion process as the customer base grows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
2 months ago
B: Agreed, that should help manage the growing backlog of files to delete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
2 months ago
B: Agreed, that should help manage the growing backlog of files to delete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
2 months ago
A: I think enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
3 months ago
A: I think enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carin
3 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think D) Reducing resource utilization for FlashBlade garbage collection could also be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
3 months ago
I agree with Vernice. Enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB would help resolve the backlog issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) Enabling fast-remove for NFS and SMB.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel