Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 7 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 7
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

A customer is deploying a FlashBlade into a datacenter where the top of rack switches cannot be configured into a single LAG.

Which two actions are necessary to configure the FlashBlade to use both switches? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Alonso at Apr 26, 2024, 01:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FBAP_002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
German
15 days ago
Alright, folks, let's keep it professional. The correct answers are C and E, and no slingshots allowed in this datacenter. Let's move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
16 days ago
Creating multiple VIPs? What is this, a networking party? Gotta stick with the LAGs and multi-chassis options, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
30 days ago
Round robin load balancing? That's like using a slingshot to take down a tank. Not the most efficient solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Lavelle
3 days ago
User 2: Agreed, that would be a better solution than round robin load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
13 days ago
User 1: We can create multiple LAGs to configure the FlashBlade with both switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reyes
1 months ago
Haha, multi-chassis configuration? That's like bringing in the big guns! Overkill for this scenario, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Mauricio
19 days ago
User 2: I think creating multiple LAGs and VIPs would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
21 days ago
User 1: Yeah, I agree. Multi-chassis seems like too much for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dong
1 months ago
Creating multiple LAGs is the way to go! That's the best option when the top of rack switches can't be configured into a single LAG. Nice to see that's one of the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
1 months ago
Creating multiple LAGs is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think the answer could also be E) Use a multi-chassis configuration to utilize both switches efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
2 months ago
I agree with Twila. We need to create multiple LAGs to use both switches effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Create multiple LAGs because we can't configure the switches into a single LAG.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
2 months ago
But shouldn't we also consider using a multi-chassis configuration for better performance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
2 months ago
I agree with Thersa. Creating multiple LAGs will help in utilizing both switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
2 months ago
I think we need to create multiple LAGs for the FlashBlade.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel