Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 6 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 6
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

The customer reports that the end clients shown in the diagram are NOT completing jobs on time. Each client writes 300MB/s to the FlashBlade for 45 minutes every hour, and they run concurrently. What does the architect need to do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Flo at Mar 09, 2024, 07:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FBAP_002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Quentin
2 months ago
Stagger the job start times, eh? Sounds like the architect needs to be a master of the time-space continuum. Maybe they can borrow Doctor Who's TARDIS while they're at it!
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
28 days ago
User 3: I agree, it might prevent the clients from overwhelming the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it could help balance the load on the FlashBlade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
2 months ago
User 1: Staggering job start times seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
2 months ago
Ooh, staggering the job start times, huh? Sounds like the architect's got a bit of a conductor's baton to wield. Better dust off those scheduling skills!
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
2 months ago
Ah, the joys of coordinating finicky clients. Staggering the start times is the way to go - no need to mess with the hardware when a little scheduling magic can do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Elli
1 months ago
User 3: No need to complicate things with hardware changes when scheduling can solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
2 months ago
User 2: Agreed, it's a simple fix that can make a big difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
2 months ago
User 1: Staggering the job start times between the clients is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lyla
3 months ago
Increasing the DataVIPs? Nah, that's just gonna make things more complex. Let's keep it simple - stagger those job start times and call it a day!
upvoted 0 times
Dierdre
2 months ago
Staggering job start times is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
2 months ago
Yeah, increasing DataVIPs might just overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
2 months ago
I agree, staggering the job start times seems like the easiest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annalee
3 months ago
Haha, staggering the job start times? Sounds like the architect needs to play scheduler extraordinaire! I'll take that over trying to wrestle with the network config any day.
upvoted 0 times
Ellsworth
2 months ago
Erick: Agreed, it's a simple fix to avoid congestion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
2 months ago
User 3: Staggering job start times seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 months ago
User 2: Definitely beats messing with the network configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
2 months ago
User 1: Yeah, playing scheduler sounds like the easiest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Domitila
3 months ago
I believe increasing the number of DataVIPs available to the clients could also help improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
3 months ago
I agree with Abraham. Staggering the job start times can help reduce the load on the FlashBlade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
3 months ago
I think the architect should stagger the job start times between the clients.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel