Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

An oil company moves geological data between their offices in Dubai and Houston for redundancy. The data is accessed via NFS mounts on a cluster of three 10GB connected Linux servers at each location.

A series of cron jobs are leveraged to replicate data from data storage pool A in Dubai to data storage B in Houston and from data storage A in Houston to data storage pool B in Dubai.

Data in storage pool A is read-write, updated by 50 cellular connected data collector running in the field, and deleted after 30 days.

Data in the storage pool B is read-only, queried by the firm's analytics team, and copied to a cloud-based archive repository every 30 days.

The total amount of data in pool A in Dubai is 1.5PB

The total amount of data in pool B in Houston is 500TB

The data is not expected to grow in the next 12 months and is compressed by the application.

Which configuration should the architect present to meet this customer needs?

A . A Multi-Chassis FlashBlade with 52TB blades for each site focusing on simplicity.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Bobbye at Jun 03, 2024, 03:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FBAP_002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Alfreda
12 days ago
Wait, they're moving data between Dubai and Houston? I hope they have a really good VPN, otherwise that's gonna be one expensive commute!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
13 days ago
I'm just picturing the poor IT admin trying to keep up with all that data. Option C seems like the safest bet, but I hope they're getting paid well!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
16 days ago
Whoa, 1.5PB of data? This is no joke! I'm glad I don't have to manage that. Option C looks solid, though. Can't go wrong with the big blades and third-party replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
28 days ago
I don't know, the 17TB blades in Option D might be a better fit. The data is compressed, so we could save some money by going with the smaller capacity blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
2 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. The 52TB blades should provide ample storage, and the third-party replication software will ensure the data is replicated between the Dubai and Houston sites.
upvoted 0 times
Cornell
9 days ago
Yeah, I agree. Using third-party replication software will add an extra layer of data protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
27 days ago
Option C sounds like a solid choice. The 52TB blades should handle the data volume well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ernest
2 months ago
I prefer option D as it focuses on performance with 17TB blades, which could be more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
2 months ago
I agree with Vincent, option C seems like the most reliable solution for the oil company's data needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice because it includes third-party replication software for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel