Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pure Storage Exam FBAP_002 Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FBAP_002 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 2
[All FBAP_002 Questions]

A customer wants to use FlashBlade as storage for a business critical, high-traffic SQL server. Why will this architecture fail?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Providencia at Mar 04, 2025, 08:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FBAP_002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dottie
17 days ago
The customer must be living in the 'Flash'back era if they think a FlashBlade can handle their SQL server like a blade of grass.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
23 days ago
Option D made me chuckle. While the customer's knowledge is important, the technical limitations of the architecture are the real issue here.
upvoted 0 times
Nathalie
2 days ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tawna
26 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if Option C is accurate. FlashBlade can scale pretty large, but the performance may still not be sufficient for a big SQL DB.
upvoted 0 times
Leontine
9 days ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusa
1 months ago
I agree, the latency of NAS could definitely cause issues for a high-traffic SQL server. Option B is also a valid concern.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsay
7 days ago
C) The FlashBlade will be unable to scale large enough for a big SQL DB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
8 days ago
B) The inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
9 days ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Howard
1 months ago
Option A seems to be the correct answer. FlashBlade is not designed to be a shared storage solution for a mission-critical SQL server.
upvoted 0 times
Major
7 days ago
D) The customer will NOT have the knowledge to run a SQL server on NAS. Lmao
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
18 days ago
C) The FlashBlade will be unable to scale large enough for a big SQL DB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
22 days ago
B) The inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
1 months ago
A) The FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yong
2 months ago
I believe the FlashBlade will be unable to scale large enough for a big SQL DB, causing the architecture to fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
2 months ago
I agree with Rolf, the inherent latency of NAS will disrupt the SQL server operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
2 months ago
I think the architecture will fail because the FlashBlade will share the database onto different blades.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel