New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRMIA 8020 Exam - Topic 1 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's 8020 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 1
[All 8020 Questions]

For the National Australia Bank - FX Options case study, which was the major cause of the loss event?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Overview of the National Australia Bank (NAB) FX Options Case Study

Traders at National Australia Bank (NAB) engaged in unauthorized foreign exchange (FX) options trading.

They smoothed profits and concealed losses using fictitious transactions and manipulated reporting.

This led to a major financial scandal and loss of investor confidence.

Key Findings of the Investigation

Traders artificially smoothed profits to avoid drawing attention to large fluctuations.

Losses were concealed from internal risk controls by manipulating trade records.

The bank's risk management and governance controls failed to detect and prevent these activities.

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect

Option

Explanation

A . Currency traders were allowed access to the risk system by the CEO.

Incorrect -- No evidence suggests CEO involvement in granting system access.

B . Currency traders concealed losses using back-office knowledge.

Incorrect -- While they concealed losses, they also smoothed profits to manipulate earnings trends.

D . Currency traders were able to complete a Management Buy Out (MBO).

Incorrect -- This event was not related to a Management Buyout (MBO); it was a trading scandal.

PRMIA Reference for Verification

PRMIA Fraud and Risk Management Case Studies

Basel Principles on Market Risk and Internal Control Failures


by Sabina at Feb 09, 2025, 01:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 8020 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Micaela
3 months ago
The CEO letting traders access the risk system was a huge mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
3 months ago
Not sure about that, could be more to the story.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
3 months ago
Wait, they actually smoothed profits? That’s wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
4 months ago
Definitely, option C seems spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
4 months ago
I heard it was mainly about traders concealing losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
4 months ago
I don’t remember much about the MBO, but it seems unlikely that would be the main cause. I thought it was more about the traders' actions in the risk management process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that the CEO's involvement in the risk system was a big issue. It seems like a conflict of interest that could lead to problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like it might have something to do with the traders smoothing profits. That sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
5 months ago
I think the major cause was related to how traders concealed losses. I remember studying about the importance of transparency in trading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. I need to recall the key facts about the National Australia Bank FX Options case and match them to the answer choices. This will take some careful analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
5 months ago
Ah, I remember this case study from the lectures. I'm pretty confident the answer is C - the currency traders were smoothing profits and concealing losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover a range of potential issues, but I'll need to think through the specifics of the case study to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward case study question. I'll need to carefully review the details to determine the major cause of the loss event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
12 months ago
If the CEO was allowing traders access to the risk system, that's a huge oversight. A should be the answer - they were giving the wrong people the keys to the kingdom.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
12 months ago
D has to be a joke, right? A management buyout as the cause of the loss event? That's just too absurd to be true.
upvoted 0 times
Suzi
11 months ago
B) Currency traders concealed losses using back office knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
12 months ago
A) Currency traders were allowed access to the risk system by the CEO.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thora
1 year ago
I'd go with B. Using back-office knowledge to cover up losses is a common way for currency traders to hide risky positions.
upvoted 0 times
Goldie
11 months ago
Yeah, currency traders concealing losses with back office knowledge is a big problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
11 months ago
I think B is the major cause of the loss event.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherron
1 year ago
I'm not sure, I think it could also be C) Currency traders smoothed profits and concealed losses. It's a common practice in the industry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
I agree with Jose, it seems like the most plausible reason for the loss event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
1 year ago
I think the major cause of the loss event was B) Currency traders concealed losses using back office knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
1 year ago
Option C seems the most likely based on the details provided. Concealing losses through profit smoothing is a classic tactic used by rogue traders.
upvoted 0 times
Billye
12 months ago
It's definitely a red flag when traders start concealing losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
1 year ago
I agree, profit smoothing is a common way to hide losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel