Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRMIA Exam 8004 Topic 1 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's 8004 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 1
[All 8004 Questions]

The Fortress Re accounting risk transfer procedures

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Sommer at May 19, 2024, 08:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 8004 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Veronique
12 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Having an independent team report to the Executive Committee is the best way to ensure proper risk management oversight.
upvoted 0 times
Britt
11 months ago
I see your point, but I still believe option C is the most crucial for ensuring proper risk management infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 months ago
I think option D is also important, reviewing the application of good governance principles is crucial for effective risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
12 months ago
I agree, having an independent team reporting to the Executive Committee ensures unbiased oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
1 years ago
I'm going with option B. Excluding legal or accounting from the Risk Management Infrastructure? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
1 years ago
Ha! Option A is the clear winner. Defining risk management in 'clear and uncertain terms' sounds like an oxymoron to me.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
11 months ago
Yeah, it doesn't make sense to define something in both clear and uncertain terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
11 months ago
C) Be independently staffed and report to an employee who is on the Executive Committee (Operating Committee) but who is NOT a business unit leader
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
11 months ago
I agree, option A is definitely contradictory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
11 months ago
Yeah, it does sound contradictory. Option A should definitely not be part of the Risk Management Infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
11 months ago
I agree, defining risk management in 'clear and uncertain terms' doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
12 months ago
B) Include financial risk management, compliance and external reporting and, to the extent that resources allow, should exclude legal or accounting
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
12 months ago
Yeah, it does sound contradictory. Option A should definitely not be part of the Risk Management Infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
12 months ago
A) Define the organization's definition of risk management as articulated by the Board in clear and uncertain terms
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
12 months ago
I agree, defining risk management in 'clear and uncertain terms' doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvie
1 years ago
Option D is the odd one out here. Reviewing the principles of good governance is important, but it's not directly part of the Risk Management Infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
1 years ago
I think option B is the one that shouldn't be part of the Risk Management Infrastructure. It mentions excluding legal or accounting, which seems counterintuitive for managing risks.
upvoted 0 times
Socorro
1 years ago
I think we should definitely include financial risk management and compliance in the infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
1 years ago
I agree, excluding legal or accounting from risk management doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel