Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRINCE2-Foundation Exam - Topic 5 Question 17 Discussion

Which of the following can be done to control the size of the Project Board on a project that involves multiple users and suppliers?
C) Create user and supplier groups
A) Create a separate Project Board to manage the supplier elements of the project
B) Create multiple smaller Project Boards during the process of Starting up a Project, one for each of the project's stages.
D) Appoint corporate quality assurance to perform the Project Assurance role for all members of the Project Board

PRINCE2-Foundation Exam - Topic 5 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Foundation exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 5
[All PRINCE2-Foundation Questions]

Which of the following can be done to control the size of the Project Board on a project that involves multiple users and suppliers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Pamella at May 03, 2022, 12:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ryan
10 months ago
Definitely agree with C, user and supplier groups streamline communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
10 months ago
Wait, appointing corporate quality assurance? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
11 months ago
C is a solid choice, keeps things organized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
11 months ago
I disagree, B could lead to confusion with too many boards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
11 months ago
I think option A makes sense for managing suppliers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
11 months ago
Appointing corporate quality assurance for Project Assurance seems like a good idea, but I’m not clear on how that impacts the size of the board itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
11 months ago
Creating user and supplier groups sounds familiar, but I wonder if that would actually reduce the size of the Project Board effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
11 months ago
I remember a practice question about having multiple boards for different stages, but I can't recall if that was the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
11 months ago
I think creating separate Project Boards could help manage complexity, but I'm not sure if that would really address all the user and supplier needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
11 months ago
This question is testing our understanding of how performance measures like ROI and Residual Income are affected by new investment decisions. I'm confident I can work through the calculations and identify the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
12 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can work this out. Gigabit Ethernet can support larger frame sizes, and NAS/SAN traffic often uses jumbo frames to improve performance. I believe the typical MTU size for this scenario is 9000 bytes, but I'll double-check my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
12 months ago
Ah, I see what's going on here. The key is to understand how EIGRP split-horizon works and how to disable it on the tunnel interface. Option A looks like the right choice to fix the routing problem.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel