Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRINCE2-Foundation Exam - Topic 2 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Foundation exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 2

[All PRINCE2-Foundation Questions]

When should the Project Board refer to corporate or programme management for a decision?

AThe stage requires resources

BIt is forecast that project level tolerance will be exceeded

CThe Senior Supplier or Senior User needs to be changed

DAny request for change needs to be approved

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Glendora at Jun 23, 2024, 02:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lisandra

9 months ago

The stage requiring resources is a solid reason too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hector

10 months ago

Totally agree, resources are a big deal!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

10 months ago

Wait, changing the Senior Supplier? That seems extreme!

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeann

10 months ago

I think any request for change should go up too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

10 months ago

Definitely when project level tolerance is exceeded!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nilsa

11 months ago

Changing the Senior Supplier or Senior User sounds important, but I wonder if that always needs a decision from higher management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frank

11 months ago

I feel like the resources issue might be a reason too, but I can't recall if that specifically requires corporate input.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hildegarde

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about needing approval for significant changes. Maybe that's when they should reach out?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ma

11 months ago

I think the Project Board should refer to corporate management when project level tolerance is forecasted to be exceeded. That seems to align with what we practiced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

11 months ago

The way I see it, the Project Board should involve higher-level management anytime a significant change request needs to be approved. That seems like the safest approach to ensure proper governance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

11 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The Project Board would need to escalate decisions if the project requires additional resources that aren't within their authority to approve. I'm pretty confident that's one of the scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rupert

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think it might also be when a key stakeholder like the Senior Supplier or Senior User needs to be changed. I'll have to review my notes to be certain.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

11 months ago

This question seems straightforward - the Project Board should refer to corporate or programme management when the project is forecast to exceed its tolerance levels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oren

11 months ago

I think the ideal build node should be ephemeral and replaceable, like we discussed in the last session. It makes sense for scalability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

11 months ago

Okay, I remember learning this in class. I think the correct order is Null, Number, String and Object. Let me review my notes to confirm.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

12 months ago

Whoa, this is a lot of information to process. I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed, but I'll try to break it down step-by-step and use the drop-down menus to the best of my ability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micah

12 months ago

Pretty sure this is about anti-money laundering regulations. I'll pick the shell banks restriction and account cancellation for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlota

1 year ago

Wait, is this a trick question? The correct answer is obviously E) All of the above. When in doubt, always go with the 'all of the above' option!

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

1 year ago

Option A is the answer, right? I mean, if the stage requires additional resources, the Project Board would need to consult with the big bosses to get that approved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nichelle

1 year ago

I'm going with Option C. If the Senior Supplier or Senior User needs to be changed, that's a big decision that the Project Board can't make on their own.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

1 year ago

I think Option D is the way to go. Any change request should be approved by the appropriate authorities, so that's when the Project Board should seek guidance from the higher-ups.

upvoted 0 times

Tegan

1 year ago

Yes, seeking guidance from higher authorities for change requests is key to keeping the project on track.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesse

1 year ago

I agree, it's crucial to get the right approvals in place before moving forward.

upvoted 0 times

...

An

1 year ago

Option D is definitely important. We need to make sure any changes are approved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chu

1 year ago

D) Any request for change needs to be approved

upvoted 0 times

...

Domingo

1 year ago

C) The Senior Supplier or Senior User needs to be changed

upvoted 0 times

...

Alana

1 year ago

B) It is forecast that project level tolerance will be exceeded

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

1 year ago

A) The stage requires resources

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Lea

1 year ago

Option B seems like the obvious choice here. If the project is forecasted to exceed its tolerance levels, the Project Board should definitely refer to higher management for a decision.

upvoted 0 times

Theola

1 year ago

C: Definitely, we don't want to make decisions that could have a big impact without consulting higher management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Twanna

1 year ago

B: Agreed, it's important to involve corporate or programme management when there's a risk of exceeding tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawanda

1 year ago

A: I think option B is the right choice. If the project is going to exceed its tolerance levels, we need to refer to higher management.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Rolland

1 year ago

I believe that referring to corporate or programme management is also necessary when there is a forecast that project level tolerance will be exceeded. It's crucial to manage risks effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

1 year ago

I agree with Jettie. It's important to involve higher management when additional resources are needed to ensure alignment with overall objectives.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

1 year ago

I think the Project Board should refer to corporate or programme management when the stage requires resources.

upvoted 0 times

...