Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 38 Discussion

Which two statements about tailoring the business case in an agile environment are CORRECT?1. It should be unnecessary because products of the highest value will be delivered first.2. It should identify the minimum viable product and when it will be delivered.3. It should take into account that the scope may be reduced during the course of the project.4. It should show the features, the order in which they will be delivered and any dependencies.
C) 3 and 4
A) 1 and 2
B) 2 and 3
D) 1 and 4

PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 1
[All PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Questions]

Which two statements about tailoring the business case in an agile environment are CORRECT?

1. It should be unnecessary because products of the highest value will be delivered first.

2. It should identify the minimum viable product and when it will be delivered.

3. It should take into account that the scope may be reduced during the course of the project.

4. It should show the features, the order in which they will be delivered and any dependencies.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Howard at Nov 23, 2023, 09:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mickie
10 months ago
Not sure about 1. Seems risky to skip tailoring entirely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
10 months ago
Totally agree with 2 and 4! Features and delivery order matter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
10 months ago
Wait, is it really unnecessary to tailor the business case? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
10 months ago
I think 3 and 4 make more sense. Scope changes are common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
10 months ago
Definitely 2 and 3! Minimum viable product is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
11 months ago
I recall that dependencies are important to track, so I lean towards 4 being correct, but I'm unsure about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think 1 is misleading because we still need to tailor the business case even in agile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the minimum viable product is crucial, so maybe 2 is definitely correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
11 months ago
I remember discussing how the business case should adapt as the project evolves, so I think 3 and 4 make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answers are 2 and 3. The business case needs to be flexible to adapt to changes in an agile environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between the minimum viable product and the scope being reduced. I'll need to think through those concepts a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the key is understanding how the business case should be tailored in an agile environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
11 months ago
Okay, I've got it - the business case should identify the MVP and when it will be delivered, and also account for the scope potentially being reduced during the project. That makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The devices are missing the "cts credentials trustsec verify 1" configuration, which is required for proper authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify which option keeps the same element names and structure as the original schema, but just changes the namespace prefix. I'll double-check my work, but I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
12 months ago
I remember that responsibility isn't about influence, so I really think the right answer is power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
12 months ago
This is a straightforward question. The costs of day-to-day business operations are clearly the operating expenses, so the answer is D. I'm confident that's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
1 year ago
I'm just glad they didn't ask about the number of developers needed to scrum a kanban. That's always a trick question!
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
1 year ago
Definitely, showing features and their delivery order is crucial in tailoring the business case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
1 year ago
I agree, identifying the minimum viable product and considering scope reduction are important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
1 year ago
I think the correct statements are 2 and 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamesha
1 year ago
Option 4 is also important - visibility into the feature roadmap and dependencies is key for stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Aretha
1 year ago
Absolutely, it also allows for adjustments in scope as the project progresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
1 year ago
That's true, it helps everyone involved understand the order in which features will be delivered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 year ago
Yes, having visibility into the feature roadmap and dependencies is crucial for stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Idella
1 year ago
I'm not sure about statement 3. I think it should be 1 and 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
I agree with Deja. Tailoring the business case in an agile environment should identify the minimum viable product and take into account scope reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
I agree with German. It's crucial to set realistic expectations upfront and be prepared for flexibility in an agile environment.
upvoted 0 times
Shanice
1 year ago
User 4: Absolutely, being prepared for flexibility is key in an agile environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 year ago
User 3: It should also take into account that the scope may be reduced during the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, that's true. It helps in setting realistic expectations upfront.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 year ago
User 1: I think it's important to identify the minimum viable product and when it will be delivered.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deja
1 year ago
I think the correct statements are 2 and 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 year ago
Options 2 and 3 seem the most relevant to me. The business case should identify the MVP and account for scope changes during the project.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel