Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PostgreSQL PGCES-02 Exam - Topic 11 Question 58 Discussion

Posted by Yolando on Apr 11, 2024 at 03:25 AM

A table named "sample" is defined as below. Select two statements which will generate a constraint error. CREATE TABLE sample ( i INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, j INTEGER,

CHECK ( i > 0 AND j < 0 ) );

Suggested Answer: A, D

Get Premium PGCES-02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
WA
Walker 10 months ago
I thought NULL would break it, but I guess not!
BE
Bettina 11 months ago
B is good too, negative j is okay.
KR
Kristofer 11 months ago
Wait, C should be fine, right? NULL is allowed!
IS
Isaac 11 months ago
Totally agree, those values don't meet the CHECK.
CA
Cassi 11 months ago
A and D will cause errors.
JE
Jennifer 12 months ago
I believe E should be fine since j is negative, but I’m confused about how NULLs interact with the constraints.
TH
Thaddeus 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the CHECK constraint was tricky. I feel like A might also cause an error since j isn't negative.
AL
Albert 12 months ago
I'm not sure about C, but I remember something about NULLs not violating CHECK constraints.
DE
Detra 1 year ago
I think option D will definitely cause a constraint error because of the NULL value for the primary key.
KA
Karan 1 year ago
Ugh, I'm a bit lost here. I'll have to re-read the question a few times and maybe even sketch it out to make sure I understand.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. I just need to identify which insert statements will violate the constraint.
NO
Novella 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is the CHECK constraint, which requires i to be greater than 0 and j to be less than 0.
TH
Thurman 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully read the table definition and think through each of the insert statements.
NO
Noe 1 year ago
Wait, what about NULL values? I'm not sure how those will interact with the constraint.
CA
Carmen 1 year ago
The key here is to focus on the specific wording of the question. It's asking about Salesforce functionalities that are ignored, not the ones that are considered. I think the answer is multiple currencies, field-level security, and record type picklist value assignments.
ER
Ernestine 1 year ago
This looks straightforward, I'll just need to carefully analyze the burndown chart to determine the iteration's status.
DE
Delfina 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I understand the concepts before answering.
JA
Janey 1 year ago
This is a job for the SQL Ninja! *strikes a dramatic pose* Okay, let's see... The `i` column must be greater than 0, and the `j` column must be less than 0. That means (A) and (D) are the troublemakers here. Time to show off my database kung-fu skills! *cracks knuckles*
BL
Blondell 1 year ago
Alright, let's do this! Hmm, the `i` column has to be positive, and the `j` column has to be negative. So (A) and (C) are definitely going to fail. Wait, did they say two statements? Guess I better double-check my work. *scratches head* Where's my SQL cheat sheet when I need it?
NI
Nieves 1 year ago
↳ replying to Blondell
User 3: And (C) violates the constraint on column j being negative.
LE
Leontine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Blondell
User 2: Yeah, (A) violates the constraint on column i being positive.
CO
Cordelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Blondell
User 1: (A) and (C) are definitely going to fail.
YA
Yaeko 1 year ago
Ah, the joys of database design. Clearly, the table gods have blessed us with a challenge! I'm gonna go with (C) and (D) as the troublemakers here. Null values and CHECK constraints don't always play nicely, you know. But hey, at least it's not a production database, right? *laughs nervously*
KI
Kimbery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yaeko
User 3: Always a fun challenge in database design!
AS
Ashton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yaeko
User 2: Yeah, null values and constraints can be tricky.
GE
Gerardo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yaeko
User 1: I think (C) and (D) are the culprits.
JO
Jose 1 year ago
Ooh, a tricky one! Okay, let's think this through. The table definition says the `i` column must be greater than 0 and the `j` column must be less than 0. So (B) and (E) should be good, but (A), (C), and (D) are gonna trigger that constraint error for sure. Time to put on my SQL thinking cap!
EU
Eulah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jose
User1: Right, both (A) and (C) are no-gos for this table.
CH
Chun 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jose
User3: (C) will also trigger the constraint error because of the NULL value.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jose
User2: Yeah, because the value of j is not less than 0.
CH
Cheryll 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jose
User1: I think (A) will cause a constraint error.
GR
Gregoria 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jose
User2: Yeah, because the value of j is not less than 0.
RO
Rozella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jose
User1: I think (A) will cause a constraint error.
BE
Berry 1 year ago
Well, look at that, an opportunity to show off my SQL prowess! Let's see, the question is which statements will generate a constraint error. Hmmm, I'm thinking (A) and (C) are the ones that will fail. Gotta love those pesky CHECK constraints!
DO
Dortha 2 years ago
I believe statement D will also generate a constraint error because it has a NULL value for i.
DA
Dannette 2 years ago
I agree with Rosina. The constraint CHECK ( i > 0 AND j < 0 ) will be violated with statement B.
RO
Rosina 2 years ago
I think statement B will generate a constraint error.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel