Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PostgreSQL PGCES-02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for PostgreSQL's PGCES-02 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 1
[All PGCES-02 Questions]

The "animal" table consists of the following data: Select the correct result returned by executing the following SQL statement: SELECT name FROM animal ORDER BY weight DESC LIMIT 2 OFFSET 1;

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Van at Mar 31, 2023, 12:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PGCES-02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Domonique
7 months ago
Are you sure this will work? Sounds off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
7 months ago
Wait, what if there are less than 2 animals?
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
7 months ago
Definitely no syntax error here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
7 months ago
I think it should return the second heaviest animal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
7 months ago
The query is valid SQL syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
8 months ago
I feel like there might be a syntax error, but I can't recall if that's possible with this query structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
8 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to use LIMIT and OFFSET together. I think it should return the second heaviest animal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about OFFSET being used to skip rows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
8 months ago
I think this SQL query should work fine since it looks like a standard SELECT statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure how to handle multiple containers in a single pod. I'll need to review the pod configuration syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about project management. I'll need to think carefully about how changes to the Business Case would impact the Project Plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
8 months ago
Port scanning is the way to go here. It's the most thorough and reliable method to identify the services running on the target system. The other options just seem too prone to errors or incomplete information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
8 months ago
This looks like a straightforward Citrix Gateway configuration question. I think the key is understanding the different components involved in the authentication process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
1 year ago
I got this one. The query looks good to me. Though, I hope the 'animal' table doesn't have any bodybuilding champs, or this could get interesting.
upvoted 0 times
Frederick
11 months ago
Let's hope there are no weightlifting animals in the table!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
11 months ago
I agree, it should skip the heaviest and return the next two in descending weight order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
11 months ago
I think it will return the second heaviest animal's name.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daren
1 year ago
Nah, man, this is totally wrong. A syntax error? Come on, this is basic SQL stuff. I bet the person who wrote this question is a llama in disguise.
upvoted 0 times
France
11 months ago
Exactly, no syntax error here. Just a simple SQL query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
11 months ago
So, the first result would be the heaviest animal, and the second result would be the next heaviest one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
11 months ago
Yeah, the query is ordering by weight in descending order and skipping the first result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
11 months ago
I think the correct result would be the second heaviest animal's name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
12 months ago
Definitely not a syntax error, just a matter of understanding the SQL query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
12 months ago
So, the correct result would be the name of the second heaviest animal in the table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
1 year ago
Yeah, the SQL statement is ordering the animals by weight in descending order and then skipping the first result and returning the next two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
1 year ago
I think the correct result would be the name of the second heaviest animal in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
1 year ago
Hold on, isn't OFFSET 1 going to skip the first record? I think this query will return the third and fourth heaviest animals instead.
upvoted 0 times
Maira
1 year ago
That makes sense. So the query will return the names of the second and third heaviest animals in descending order of weight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 year ago
Yes, you are correct. The OFFSET 1 will skip the first record, so it will return the third and fourth heaviest animals.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashunda
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the query is valid. It should return the second and third heaviest animals in the 'animal' table, ordered by weight in descending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the SQL statement will return the name of the heaviest animal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
1 year ago
I agree with German, the SQL statement will return the name of the second heaviest animal.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 year ago
I think the correct result will be the name of the second heaviest animal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel