PMI-CPMAI Exam - Topic 6 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-CPMAI exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 6

A government agency plans to implement a new AI-driven solution for automating risk analysis. The project team needs to ensure that all stakeholders accept the solution and the project scope is well-defined. They must identify whether the AI approach is the best solution compared to traditional methods.

Which method meets this objective?

AConducting a detailed analysis to evaluate other potential AI solutions

BUtilizing a hybrid approach combining cognitive and noncognitive parts to satisfy all parties

CDeveloping a prototype using generative adversarial networks (GANs)

DPerforming a comprehensive AI go/no-go assessment focusing on technology and data factors

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

In the CPMAI-aligned approach, before committing to an AI solution, teams perform a structured AI go/no-go assessment to determine whether AI is actually the right tool compared with traditional analytical or rules-based methods. This assessment looks at data readiness, technical feasibility, business value, risk, and alignment with stakeholder expectations. It is also where the project scope is clarified and boundaries are set: what problems AI will address, what remains non-AI, and what success looks like in measurable terms.

CPMAI and PMI-style AI guidance emphasize that you should not jump directly into model building or specific architectures before you have answered the fundamental question: ''Is AI the appropriate approach here, given our data and constraints?'' The go/no-go assessment explicitly compares AI options with conventional solutions, evaluates whether available data is sufficient and usable, and highlights ethical, regulatory, and operational risks. This process provides a transparent, evidence-based decision that helps gain acceptance from stakeholders because they see that AI was chosen (or rejected) after a systematic evaluation. Therefore, performing a comprehensive AI go/no-go assessment focusing on technology and data factors is the method that best meets the objective.

by Pansy at Dec 20, 2025, 02:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-CPMAI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aleisha

I agree, but B could work too. A hybrid approach might please everyone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

5 days ago

I think option D is the best. A thorough assessment is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Twana

10 days ago

GANs sound cool, but is that really practical for this?

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

15 days ago

A hybrid approach could really cover all bases, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franchesca

21 days ago

Wait, are we sure AI is the best route?

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

26 days ago

Totally agree, a go/no-go assessment is crucial!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

1 month ago

A detailed analysis? Ain't nobody got time for that! Let's just go with the hybrid approach and call it a day.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerri

1 month ago

Option D sounds like the most thorough approach. Can't leave any stone unturned when it comes to AI.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorsey

2 months ago

Hmm, I don't know. Feels like a tough decision. Maybe I'll just flip a coin.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catrice

2 months ago

C could be interesting, but I'm not sure a prototype is the best way to evaluate the overall solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

2 months ago

I'm feeling B on this one. Gotta keep everyone happy, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

James

2 months ago

Developing a prototype with GANs seems interesting, but I’m not convinced it would address the project scope or stakeholder acceptance effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamar

3 months ago

I feel like a go/no-go assessment could really clarify whether AI is the right choice. We talked about that in our study group, but I wonder if it covers all stakeholder concerns.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

3 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to evaluate different AI methods. Conducting a detailed analysis sounds like a solid option, but it might take a lot of time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selene

3 months ago

Option C with the generative adversarial networks prototype could be a creative way to demonstrate the capabilities of the AI solution. But I'm not sure if that's the most appropriate method for this particular objective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tricia

3 months ago

I'm leaning towards option A. Conducting a detailed analysis to evaluate other potential AI solutions seems like it would give the team a good understanding of the landscape and help them make the best decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

3 months ago

Option B sounds interesting - a hybrid approach could be a good way to satisfy all the stakeholders. But I'm not sure how that would work in practice compared to the other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bethanie

4 months ago

I'm a little unsure about this one. The question seems to be asking about the best method to ensure stakeholder acceptance and define the project scope. I'm not sure if the AI go/no-go assessment in option D is the most relevant approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanne

4 months ago

I think option D is the way to go here. A comprehensive AI assessment focusing on the technology and data factors seems like the best way to ensure the solution is the right fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

4 months ago

I think option D makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chandra

4 months ago

Option D seems like the way to go. Gotta cover all the bases with that comprehensive assessment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alayna

4 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of stakeholder acceptance in our last class. It seems like a hybrid approach could help with that, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...