Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Ping Identity PAP-001 Exam - Topic 5 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Ping Identity's PAP-001 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 5
[All PAP-001 Questions]

A business application must be accessible via two FQDNs. Which PingAccess functionality should an administrator use to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Virtual Hosts in PingAccess define the external FQDNs (and ports) through which applications are accessed. An application can be bound to multiple virtual hosts to allow access via multiple FQDNs.

Exact Extract:

''A virtual host specifies the fully qualified domain name and port number through which an application is accessed.''

Option A (Virtual Hosts) is correct --- multiple FQDNs can be supported by assigning multiple virtual hosts.

Option B (Applications) define resource protection but do not manage FQDN binding.

Option C (Sites) define back-end targets, not the public-facing FQDN.

Option D (Web Sessions) handle authentication state, unrelated to hostnames.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Nana
1 month ago
A) Virtual Hosts is definitely the best choice. Clear functionality!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
1 month ago
Not so sure. What about B) Applications? Could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
1 month ago
I agree, A) Virtual Hosts is the way to go. Easy to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
2 months ago
I think it's A) Virtual Hosts. Makes sense for multiple FQDNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
2 months ago
I can't believe this is even a question! It's obviously A!
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
2 months ago
Wait, are you sure it's not C) Sites? That sounds plausible too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 months ago
A) Virtual Hosts is correct, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
2 months ago
I thought it was B) Applications? Seems like a better fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
2 months ago
Definitely A) Virtual Hosts. That's the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
C) Sites is the way to go. Gotta keep those FQDNs under control, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
3 months ago
A) Virtual Hosts sounds like a cool superhero name, but it's not the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
3 months ago
C) Sites is the correct answer. This allows you to configure multiple FQDNs for a single application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) Applications, but I have a nagging feeling that Virtual Hosts is the better fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
4 months ago
Could it be C) Sites? I feel like that option was mentioned in a similar context during our study sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about managing applications, but I don't think that's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
4 months ago
I think the answer might be A) Virtual Hosts, but I'm not entirely sure how it works with multiple FQDNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
4 months ago
I'm confident the answer is B) Applications. That's where you configure the application details, including the FQDNs, in PingAccess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
4 months ago
I'm not too familiar with PingAccess, but based on the question, I'd say the answer is probably C) Sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. We need to make the app accessible via two FQDNs, so I'm guessing we'd use the Sites functionality to configure that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Is it Virtual Hosts or Applications? I'll need to review the PingAccess documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
5 months ago
I think I know the answer to this one. Virtual Hosts sounds like the right functionality to use.
upvoted 0 times
Gerardo
15 days ago
Definitely the way to go for that requirement!
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
20 days ago
Yeah, it allows multiple FQDNs for the same app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
25 days ago
I agree, Virtual Hosts seems to fit perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel