Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Ping Identity PAP-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 12 Discussion

Posted by Keshia on Apr 04, 2026 at 06:52 AM

A company uses an internally based legacy PKI solution that does not adhere to the Certification Path Validation section of RFC-5280. Which configuration option needs to be enabled when creating Trusted Certificate Groups in PingAccess?

Suggested Answer: B

Legacy PKIs often provide certificate chains that are out of order or non-compliant with RFC-5280 path validation. PingAccess provides an option in Trusted Certificate Groups called Validate disordered certificate chains to allow chaining even if the order is not RFC-5280 compliant.

Exact Extract:

''Enable Validate disordered certificate chains when the certificate chain is not in RFC-5280 compliant order but should still be accepted.''

Option A is incorrect; using the Java trust store is unrelated to PKI ordering.

Option B is correct --- this setting allows PingAccess to process disordered certificate chains.

Option C is incorrect; date checks are unrelated to RFC-5280 path ordering.

Option D is incorrect; revocation status handling does not address legacy PKI ordering issues.


Get Premium PAP-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
JA
Jacki 3 months ago
I agree with Virgie. Validating disordered chains is key for compatibility.
DA
Danica 3 months ago
I feel like option D is safer. Denying when revocation status is unknown is crucial.
VI
Virgie 3 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. It helps with the legacy PKI issue.
AS
Ashley 3 months ago
Can someone explain why we wouldn't want to deny on revocation status?
AI
Aileen 3 months ago
Definitely B) is needed for legacy systems like this.
SK
Skye 4 months ago
Wait, are we really skipping certificate date checks? That sounds risky!
JA
Jamal 5 months ago
I disagree, I think A) Use Java Trust Store is more relevant here.
YU
Yuki 5 months ago
B) Validate disordered certificate chains is the right choice.
AN
Angelica 6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where revocation status was crucial, so I wonder if denying when unable to determine revocation status could be a key factor here.
DA
Dalene 6 months ago
I feel like skipping the certificate date check could lead to security risks, so it probably isn't the right option.
WA
Wayne 6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the Java Trust Store being important for legacy systems. Maybe that's the answer?
KA
Kara 6 months ago
I think the option about validating disordered certificate chains might be the right choice since the legacy PKI could have issues with the order of certificates.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel