New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Ping Identity PAP-001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Ping Identity's PAP-001 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 2
[All PAP-001 Questions]

A PingAccess administrator needs to configure PingAccess to validate tokens. Which two options can the administrator use? (Choose 2 answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

PingAccess validates access tokens using Access Token Managers, which are typically backed by PingFederate or a generic OIDC provider.

Exact Extract:

''PingAccess validates tokens through Access Token Managers, which can be configured against PingFederate or a common OIDC provider.''

Option A (PingFederate) is correct --- the most common token provider.

Option B (Kerberos) is not supported for token validation.

Option C (SAML provider) is incorrect --- PingAccess does not natively consume SAML assertions.

Option D (Common OIDC provider) is correct --- tokens can be validated against any OIDC-compliant IdP.

Option E (PingAuthorize) is an authorization engine, not a token provider.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Loren
9 hours ago
I feel D is crucial for OIDC support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
6 days ago
I’m not so sure about the SAML provider being valid here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
11 days ago
Surprised that PingAuthorize isn't on the list!
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
16 days ago
Totally agree with A and D!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
21 days ago
I thought Kerberos was an option too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
26 days ago
A) PingFederate and D) Common OIDC provider are the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
1 month ago
I feel like PingAuthorize might be relevant, but I can't quite remember how it fits into the token validation process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about Kerberos; I don’t recall it being directly related to token validation in PingAccess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
1 month ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think the Common OIDC provider could be the right choice too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
2 months ago
I think PingFederate is definitely one of the options since it deals with token validation, but I'm not sure about the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
2 months ago
Wait, we're supposed to choose two answers? I just picked one. Oops, my bad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
2 months ago
A and D? Psh, everyone knows the answer is C and E. This is too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
2 months ago
I agree, A and D make sense for token validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
A and D? Really? I thought the answer was B and E. This exam is trying to trick us!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
2 months ago
I think A and D are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
3 months ago
A and D? That's what I chose too! Great minds think alike, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
3 months ago
A is definitely needed, but I’m unsure about D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question is a bit tricky. I'll have to think about it some more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
3 months ago
A and E, of course! PingFederate and PingAuthorize are the way to go for token validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
4 months ago
I think B and C are the right choices. Kerberos and Common SAML provider seem like the logical options for validating tokens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
4 months ago
A and D are the correct options. PingFederate and Common OIDC provider can be used to validate tokens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the Kerberos and PingAuthorize options. Those don't seem directly relevant to the task of configuring PingAccess to validate tokens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
4 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is PingFederate and common OIDC provider. Those are the two options that are directly related to token validation in a PingAccess environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
4 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. PingFederate and common OIDC provider both deal with identity and access management, so those seem like good options to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know PingAccess is used for authentication, but I'm not sure which of these options are actually used for token validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on PingAccess configuration. I'll focus on the options that specifically mention token validation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel