Discuss Ping Identity PAP-001 Exam Topic 2 Question 2

A PingAccess administrator needs to configure PingAccess to validate tokens. Which two options can the administrator use? (Choose 2 answers)

Suggested Answer: A, D

PingAccess validates access tokens using Access Token Managers, which are typically backed by PingFederate or a generic OIDC provider.

Exact Extract:

''PingAccess validates tokens through Access Token Managers, which can be configured against PingFederate or a common OIDC provider.''

Option A (PingFederate) is correct --- the most common token provider.

Option B (Kerberos) is not supported for token validation.

Option C (SAML provider) is incorrect --- PingAccess does not natively consume SAML assertions.

Option D (Common OIDC provider) is correct --- tokens can be validated against any OIDC-compliant IdP.

Option E (PingAuthorize) is an authorization engine, not a token provider.

Get Premium PAP-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

34 comments · newest first

Rashida 6 months ago

I just feel more confident with A and D for this question.

Shayne 7 months ago

True, but it could still play a role in the overall setup.

Pete 7 months ago

E is more about access control, not validation.

Jamie 7 months ago

What about E? PingAuthorize could be relevant too.

Loren 8 months ago

I feel D is crucial for OIDC support.

Cathrine 8 months ago

I’m not so sure about the SAML provider being valid here.

Samira 8 months ago

Surprised that PingAuthorize isn't on the list!

Donte 8 months ago

Totally agree with A and D!

Micheline 8 months ago

I thought Kerberos was an option too?

Tammara 8 months ago

A) PingFederate and D) Common OIDC provider are the right choices.

Tatum 9 months ago

I feel like PingAuthorize might be relevant, but I can't quite remember how it fits into the token validation process.

Harris 9 months ago

I’m a bit confused about Kerberos; I don’t recall it being directly related to token validation in PingAccess.

Hillary 9 months ago

I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think the Common OIDC provider could be the right choice too.

Levi 9 months ago

I think PingFederate is definitely one of the options since it deals with token validation, but I'm not sure about the second one.

Tonette 9 months ago

Wait, we're supposed to choose two answers? I just picked one. Oops, my bad.

Audra 9 months ago

A and D? Psh, everyone knows the answer is C and E. This is too easy!

Rashida 10 months ago

I agree, A and D make sense for token validation.

Belen 10 months ago

A and D? Really? I thought the answer was B and E. This exam is trying to trick us!

Shayne 10 months ago

I think A and D are the best options.

Edmond 10 months ago

A and D? That's what I chose too! Great minds think alike, am I right?

Norah 10 months ago

A is definitely needed, but I’m unsure about D.

Loren 11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. This question is a bit tricky. I'll have to think about it some more.

Adelle 11 months ago

A and E, of course! PingFederate and PingAuthorize are the way to go for token validation.

Lottie 11 months ago

I think B and C are the right choices. Kerberos and Common SAML provider seem like the logical options for validating tokens.

Viola 11 months ago

A and D are the correct options. PingFederate and Common OIDC provider can be used to validate tokens.

Alyce 12 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the Kerberos and PingAuthorize options. Those don't seem directly relevant to the task of configuring PingAccess to validate tokens.

Stanton 12 months ago

I'm pretty confident the answer is PingFederate and common OIDC provider. Those are the two options that are directly related to token validation in a PingAccess environment.

Lashandra 12 months ago

Okay, let's think this through. PingFederate and common OIDC provider both deal with identity and access management, so those seem like good options to consider.

Alverta 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know PingAccess is used for authentication, but I'm not sure which of these options are actually used for token validation.

Crista 1 year ago

This looks like a straightforward question on PingAccess configuration. I'll focus on the options that specifically mention token validation.

Antonio 6 months ago

↳ replying to Crista

C is good, but A and D are more specific for tokens.

Lera 6 months ago

↳ replying to Crista

What about C? It could work too, right?

Ma 6 months ago

↳ replying to Crista

Definitely, A and D make sense for token validation.

Dana 6 months ago

↳ replying to Crista

I think A and D are the best choices.

Ping Identity PAP-001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion