New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert DevSecOps Exam - Topic 4 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's DevSecOps exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 4
[All DevSecOps Questions]

Which of the following BEST describes an example of technical or design dew when designing for defensibility?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Nana at Jul 05, 2023, 01:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DevSecOps Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Verlene
3 months ago
Not sure about C, but I guess it depends on the project size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
3 months ago
A is a huge mistake, can't ignore critical features in a sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
4 months ago
Wait, are we really saying documentation isn't important? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
4 months ago
I think D is more critical, requirements need to be clear from the start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
4 months ago
Definitely B, security should always be in the definition of done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
4 months ago
I’m torn between A and B, but I think prioritizing customer features is important too, so maybe A isn’t the right answer after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
4 months ago
I feel like option D could also be relevant because not having all requirements upfront can lead to issues later, but I’m not confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
5 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized the importance of documentation, so I’m leaning towards option C, but it feels a bit vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
I think option B might be the best choice since security controls are crucial for defensibility, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
5 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about the different types of testing in class. I think the answer is A, white box testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
5 months ago
I think the first price tier is defined in the Default Storefront Pricelist, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
5 months ago
SQL injections and binary tampering are also serious issues to watch out for. I'll make sure to cover those as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question specifically mentions a "Support Snapshot," and the correct answer is C, tmsh save sys ucs support. That command is used to create a UCS file, which is the same as a Support Snapshot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
10 months ago
As a security enthusiast, I'd say Option B is the way to go. Gotta build in those security controls from the start!
upvoted 0 times
Lashawnda
8 months ago
Definitely, starting with security controls is crucial for defensibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
8 months ago
I think not including security controls is a big oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
9 months ago
I agree, security should be a top priority in design.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
10 months ago
Option C is a good one too. Lack of documentation and training can definitely undermine the defensibility of a system.
upvoted 0 times
Regenia
9 months ago
C) Not developing comprehensive documentation and training material
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
9 months ago
B) Not including the addition of security controls in the definition of done
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
9 months ago
A) Not prioritizing the set of critical customer feature in the current sprint
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
Haha, Option A sounds like something my team would do. Not prioritizing critical customer features? That's a classic rookie mistake!
upvoted 0 times
Elly
9 months ago
Lucy: Definitely, we can't afford to overlook that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
9 months ago
User 2: Totally agree. It's essential for the success of the product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
9 months ago
User 1: Yeah, that's a big no-no. We should always prioritize customer features.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reta
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but Option D seems a bit off. Establishing all requirements before the first iteration might not be the most agile approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
10 months ago
I think C) Not developing comprehensive documentation and training material is also important for defensibility. Without proper documentation, it can be difficult to maintain and defend the design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
10 months ago
I agree with Sommer. Security is crucial for defensibility, so not including it in the design is a big mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
10 months ago
I think the best example is B) Not including the addition of security controls in the definition of done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
10 months ago
I believe C) Not developing comprehensive documentation and training material is also important for defensibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
11 months ago
I agree with Ira. Security is crucial for defensibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
11 months ago
I think the best example is B) Not including the addition of security controls in the definition of done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
11 months ago
Option B seems to be the correct answer here. Including security controls in the definition of done is crucial for designing a defensible system.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvie
9 months ago
Establishing all product requirements early on is key for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
9 months ago
Comprehensive documentation and training material are crucial as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
9 months ago
I think prioritizing critical customer features is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
10 months ago
I agree, security controls are essential for defensibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel