Which of the following BEST describes the most important rationale for NOT seeking an SLO of 100% availability?
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
The SRE Book clearly states: ''A target of 100% availability is neither realistic nor economically viable at scale.'' Complex distributed systems inherently experience failures, network issues, hardware faults, and dependency outages. SRE emphasizes embracing this reality through error budgets, which assume some failure and allow engineering resources to be used efficiently.
The primary reason not to set 100% availability is that it is impossible to achieve reliably and leads to wasted engineering effort. SRE states: ''Chasing perfect reliability leads to dramatically increasing costs with diminishing returns.''
Option A captures this rationale precisely.
Options B, C, and D are secondary or incorrect interpretations and do not come directly from SRE principles.
Thus, A is the correct SRE-aligned answer.
Site Reliability Engineering, Chapter: ''Service Level Objectives.''
The Site Reliability Workbook, sections on Error Budgets and realistic SLOs.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!