Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PeopleCert DevOps-Leader Exam - Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion

How is traditional IT organized?
C) By function
A) Cross-functional cells or squads
B) Optimized for flow
D) No handoffs between teams

PeopleCert DevOps-Leader Exam - Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's DevOps-Leader exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 2
[All DevOps-Leader Questions]

How is traditional IT organized?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is C because traditional IT is typically organized by function. Common examples include separate departments for development, testing, infrastructure, security, service desk, operations, architecture, change management, and release management. Each function has its own management structure, priorities, metrics, queues, and operating rhythm. This design can create specialization, but it often introduces delays, fragmented ownership, and handoffs across the delivery lifecycle.

DevOps challenges this model by focusing on end-to-end value streams and cross-functional ownership. Instead of optimizing individual departments, DevOps seeks to optimize the whole system of work. Cross-functional cells or squads are therefore more consistent with a DevOps operating model than a traditional IT structure. Similarly, being optimized for flow and having fewer handoffs are DevOps characteristics because they support faster feedback, smaller batches, clearer accountability, and improved reliability.

Functional organization is a central reason traditional IT often struggles with slow delivery and operational instability. Work must pass between teams, creating queues, misalignment, and limited shared accountability for outcomes. Relevant study guide references: Target Operating Models and Organizational Designs; Becoming a DevOps Organization; Measuring to Improve.

==============


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shasta
5 days ago
B) Optimized for flow makes sense too. It improves efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
10 days ago
I agree, but I feel A) Cross-functional cells or squads is more modern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
15 days ago
I think it's C) By function. That's how I've seen it in most companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
21 days ago
Cross-functional cells are becoming more popular, though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
26 days ago
Optimized for flow is a nice idea, but hard to achieve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 month ago
Wait, no handoffs? That sounds unrealistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
1 month ago
Totally agree, C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 month ago
It's usually organized by function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the answer is C. Traditional IT is definitely more about functional organization than flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
2 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think traditional setups often have handoffs between teams, which can slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 months ago
I remember something about cross-functional teams being more common in Agile, but traditional IT feels more siloed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
2 months ago
I think traditional IT is usually organized by function, right? Like, you have separate teams for development, operations, etc.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel