Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert CSQA Exam - Topic 2 Question 76 Discussion

To reduce the cost of quality, the QA Analyst could:
A) Increase Build Cost
B) Decrease Preventive Costs
C) Increase Preventive Costs
D) None of the above

PeopleCert CSQA Exam - Topic 2 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's CSQA exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 2
[All CSQA Questions]

To reduce the cost of quality, the QA Analyst could:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Regenia at Oct 20, 2023, 03:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ben
7 months ago
None of these options make sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
8 months ago
Wait, how does decreasing preventive costs save money?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
8 months ago
Increasing build cost won't help at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
8 months ago
Totally agree, preventive measures are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
8 months ago
Decreasing preventive costs? That sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
9 months ago
I’m leaning towards "None of the above," but I wish I had reviewed more examples before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
9 months ago
I feel like increasing preventive costs could actually help in the long run, but I’m not confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
9 months ago
I remember a practice question where decreasing preventive costs was considered a bad idea. It might be the same here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
9 months ago
I think increasing build cost doesn't make sense if we're trying to reduce quality costs, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
9 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Increasing preventive costs is supposed to reduce quality costs, right? Let me re-read the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the right answer here. Reducing preventive costs is the key to lowering overall quality costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
9 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy - I'll eliminate the options that don't make sense and see what's left.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
9 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this. I'll have to review the concepts on quality costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
9 months ago
This is a classic question that often comes up on these types of exams. I'm pretty confident I know the right answer, but I'll quickly review the information just to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
9 months ago
I think the Proactive Insights feature is meant to help identify and address network issues, so I'm going to focus on the options that mention that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
10 months ago
I feel good about the object-sharing behavior and Object being the root class. Those seem like solid object-oriented concepts in Java.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which ones are the most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
1 year ago
Wait, are we trying to reduce quality or the cost of quality? I'm so confused, I might just start throwing darts at the answer choices!
upvoted 0 times
Erick
1 year ago
D) None of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
1 year ago
C) Increase Preventive Costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 year ago
B) Decrease Preventive Costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 year ago
A) Increase Build Cost
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carolynn
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is 'None of the above' (option D). What kind of QA Analyst would increase costs to reduce costs? Sounds like a bad joke!
upvoted 0 times
Ronny
1 year ago
User 3: Agreed, that would be counterproductive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, increasing costs to reduce costs doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is 'None of the above' (option D).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
1 year ago
Hold on, I thought the goal was to reduce costs, not increase them! This question is really making me scratch my head.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
1 year ago
Hmm, decreasing preventive costs (option B) could lead to more issues down the line. I wonder if the correct answer is actually increasing preventive costs (option C).
upvoted 0 times
Desmond
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice to maintain quality and reduce overall costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
1 year ago
Increasing preventive costs could help catch issues early and prevent them from becoming bigger problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
1 year ago
I agree, cutting preventive costs might save money now but could cost more in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juliana
1 year ago
Choosing option A to increase build cost seems counterintuitive if the goal is to reduce quality costs. I'll have to think this through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Joni
1 year ago
Maybe increasing preventive costs would be a better option to reduce quality costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 year ago
I agree, increasing build cost doesn't seem like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 year ago
C) Increase Preventive Costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
1 year ago
A) Increase Build Cost
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nicholle
1 year ago
I think increasing build cost could also be a viable option to improve quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe decreasing preventive costs would be more effective in reducing the overall cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
1 year ago
I think the QA Analyst could increase preventive costs to reduce the cost of quality.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel