MENU
With AlOps, offering aggressive SLAs results in:
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium AIOps Foundation Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
GE
Georgene
11 months ago
There’s definitely a relation, can’t ignore that!
MA
Margurite
11 months ago
No change to risk? That seems unlikely.
JO
Johnathon
11 months ago
I thought it would decrease risk, interesting take.
MO
Monte
11 months ago
Totally agree, it increases risk for sure!
JE
Jenelle
11 months ago
Aggressive SLAs usually mean more pressure.
PH
Phuong
12 months ago
I thought we discussed that aggressive SLAs usually mean higher risk, especially if the resources aren't sufficient.
AD
Adelaide
12 months ago
I feel like there's a connection between SLAs and risk, but I can't recall if it's positive or negative.
DO
Dominque
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that suggested aggressive SLAs could lead to decreased risk if managed well.
BU
Bulah
1 year ago
I think offering aggressive SLAs might actually increase risk because it puts more pressure on the team to deliver.
DO
Donte
1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. AlOps is about improving operations, so offering aggressive SLAs should actually decrease the risk, right? I'm going with A for this one.
AL
Alida
1 year ago
I think the key here is understanding how AlOps, which is all about automation and optimization, impacts the risk of aggressive SLAs. My guess is that B is the correct answer.
LA
Lavina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to think it through more carefully. Is there a relationship between AlOps and SLAs that I'm missing?
AL
Alison
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B - Increased risk. With aggressive SLAs, you have to deliver on tight timelines, which increases the chances of issues and failures.
KE
Keneth
2 years ago
C) No change to risk. Because with AIOps, the risk is already off the charts. Might as well offer aggressive SLAs and see how much more chaos we can create.
LO
Lourdes
2 years ago
C) No change to risk. Because with AIOps, the risk is already off the charts. Might as well offer aggressive SLAs and see how much more chaos we can create.
EV
Evan
2 years ago
A) Decreased risk
TI
Timothy
2 years ago
I think there is no change to risk when offering aggressive SLAs.
FE
Felton
2 years ago
D) There is no relation. AIOps and SLAs? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Might as well ask a fish to fly a plane.
JO
Jody
2 years ago
C) No change to risk
MA
Malika
2 years ago
B) Increased risk
AR
Arminda
2 years ago
A) Decreased risk
JE
Jerilyn
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it actually decreases risk.
LA
Lawrence
2 years ago
B) Increased risk. AIOps may be advanced, but it's not a magical risk-eliminator. Pushing those SLAs too hard is a recipe for disaster.
GE
Georgiana
2 years ago
D) There is no relation
WE
Wendell
2 years ago
C) No change to risk
TU
Tula
2 years ago
B) Increased risk
JO
Johnetta
2 years ago
A) Decreased risk
LO
Loren
2 years ago
Increased risk, for sure. Offering aggressive SLAs with AIOps is like juggling chainsaws blindfolded. What could go wrong, right?
JA
Janna
2 years ago
B) Increased risk
VI
Vincenza
2 years ago
A) Decreased risk
DA
Darrel
2 years ago
B) Increased risk
JU
Justine
2 years ago
I think offering aggressive SLAs results in increased risk.