Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert Exam 20 Topic 2 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's 20 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 2
[All 20 Questions]

If you can Poka-Yoke a defect out of the process entirely then you do not need use SPC on the characteristic of interest in the defect.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Zita at May 31, 2024, 12:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Kristian
10 months ago
Poisson all the way! I mean, who wants to deal with all the extra parameters of the Extended or Weibull distributions when a good old Poisson can get the job done?
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
10 months ago
Haha, I bet the Exponential distribution is like, 'Nah, I'm not the right fit for this one.' Gotta love when the options are so clearly not applicable.
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
9 months ago
C) Poisson
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
9 months ago
A) Exponential
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
10 months ago
I was thinking the Weibull distribution, but the Poisson makes more sense for this scenario. It can handle the discrete nature of the defects.
upvoted 0 times
Isadora
9 months ago
Yeah, the Poisson distribution is great for modeling rare events like stitch defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
9 months ago
I agree, the Poisson distribution would be better for counting defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remedios
10 months ago
The Poisson distribution seems like the obvious choice here. It's great for modeling count data like the number of defects in a fabric.
upvoted 0 times
Lashonda
10 months ago
I'm not sure about the Weibull distribution, but I think Poisson is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
10 months ago
I think the Exponential distribution could also work well for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
10 months ago
I agree, the Poisson distribution is perfect for modeling count data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
10 months ago
I'm not sure about the Weibull distribution, it may not be the best choice for modeling stitch defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
10 months ago
I think the Exponential distribution could also work well for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
10 months ago
I agree, the Poisson distribution is perfect for modeling count data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carissa
11 months ago
I agree with Raul, Poisson Distribution is commonly used for count data like stitch defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
11 months ago
I think the Poisson Distribution would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel