Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems PEGAPCSSA87V1 Exam - Topic 9 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSSA87V1 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 9
[All PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions]

A report needs to list the user ID of the manager of the operator who creates a time-off case. The report provides information from the MyCo-HR-SelfService-Work-TimeOff and Data-Admin-Operator-ID classes.

Which two options independently satisfy the business outcome? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jerlene at May 22, 2024, 01:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bok
6 months ago
Totally agree, A and D are the best options here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
6 months ago
Wait, can D really handle both classes? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
6 months ago
C seems a bit off, not sure it fits the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
7 months ago
I think B could work too, but not as efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
7 months ago
A is definitely a solid choice for joining data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
7 months ago
I feel like specifying classes in the Pages & Classes tab is important, so option D could be a good choice too, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
7 months ago
I recall using association rules in a similar question, so option C might be correct, but I’m a bit hesitant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about option B, but adding parameters seems like something we covered in the context of filtering reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
8 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar; I remember we practiced class joins in our last session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
8 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think configuring a class join is the way to go - that should let me pull in all the data I need from those two classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
8 months ago
Okay, the key here is that we need to get the manager's user ID, not just the operator's ID. So I think I'll focus on the join options that can pull in that extra information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused about the difference between a class join and an association rule. I'll need to review those concepts before deciding which approach to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
8 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward report question. I think I'll start by looking at the two classes mentioned and seeing how I can join them together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
8 months ago
I think the key here is to avoid routing loops, so I'm leaning towards option C - redistributing the routes as external type 2. That should help prevent loops while still allowing the mutual redistribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The implementation phase is all about executing the plan, so the right answer has to be D - gauging audience reaction and feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 year ago
D? Really? Specifying the classes in the report definition? That's just stating the obvious. A and C are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Noel
12 months ago
D) Specify both classes in the Pages & Classes tab on the report definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
C) Use an association rule to join operator information to each case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
1 year ago
A) Configure a class join on the report definition to join operator information to each case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaun
1 year ago
B is a bit of a cop-out, just adding the operator ID as a parameter. Where's the fun in that? I'm going with A and C.
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
12 months ago
Specifying both classes in the Pages & Classes tab on the report definition seems like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 year ago
C) Use an association rule to join operator information to each case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 year ago
Using an association rule could also be beneficial in joining operator information to each case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 year ago
A class join would definitely help in linking operator information to each case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
1 year ago
I agree, B does seem like a cop-out. A and C would provide more detailed information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
1 year ago
A) Configure a class join on the report definition to join operator information to each case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more straightforward and easier to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it uses an association rule to join operator information to each case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
1 year ago
A and C seem like the most logical options to me. Joining the classes directly or using an association rule would both give us the needed operator information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows us to join operator information to each case.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel