Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCSSA87V1 Topic 8 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSSA87V1 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 8
[All PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions]

In which scenario would a Declare OnChange rule be appropriate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Annmarie at Jul 03, 2023, 08:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Margurite
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go, for sure. Unless, of course, the user's new address is just their fridge. Then it's a whole different story!
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
1 months ago
Yeah, it ensures that the case is handled properly before proceeding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
1 months ago
I agree, suspending the active case until the address is confirmed makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
2 months ago
Option C is definitely the best choice for that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
3 months ago
I'm going with C as well. Honestly, the other options just don't seem to fit the bill for a Declare OnChange rule. This one's a no-brainer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
3 months ago
Option C sounds good to me. It's all about that address confirmation, you know? Like, 'Hey, you can't move until we double-check your new digs!'
upvoted 0 times
King
1 months ago
Definitely. It helps ensure that the case is handled properly and accurately before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It makes sense to suspend the active case until the address is confirmed. Keeps everything in order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
2 months ago
Option C sounds good to me. It's all about that address confirmation, you know? Like, 'Hey, you can't move until we double-check your new digs!'
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellsworth
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't a Declare OnChange rule be more appropriate for option D, where the case is routed back to the appropriate case worker when a manager approves it?
upvoted 0 times
Roosevelt
2 months ago
I see your point, option C could also be a good use case for a Declare OnChange rule. It really depends on the specific requirements of the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
2 months ago
But what about option C, where the active case is suspended until the address can be confirmed? Wouldn't that also be a good scenario for a Declare OnChange rule?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
I think you might be right, option D does seem like a good fit for a Declare OnChange rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alita
3 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The Declare OnChange rule would be useful to suspend the active case until the address can be confirmed when a user updates their address.
upvoted 0 times
Alexia
23 days ago
Definitely, using a Declare OnChange rule in that situation would help maintain data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
24 days ago
That way the case can be handled accurately and efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
25 days ago
It makes sense to suspend the active case until the address is confirmed when a user updates their address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
26 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the most appropriate scenario for a Declare OnChange rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
27 days ago
Definitely, it helps maintain data integrity and ensures accurate case management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
28 days ago
That way, the process can ensure that the case is handled correctly based on the updated information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
1 months ago
Yes, it makes sense to use the rule to suspend the active case until the address is confirmed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most appropriate scenario for a Declare OnChange rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Launa
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think scenario D could also be a valid option. When a manager approves a case, routing it back to the case worker could benefit from a Declare OnChange rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
3 months ago
I agree with Arthur. When a user updates their address, it makes sense to suspend the active case until the address is confirmed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
3 months ago
I think a Declare OnChange rule would be appropriate in scenario C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
3 months ago
I disagree. I believe a Declare OnChange rule would be more appropriate in scenario D, when a manager approves a case and it needs to be routed back to the case worker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
4 months ago
I agree with Felicitas. When a user updates their address, it makes sense to suspend the active case until the address is confirmed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
4 months ago
I think a Declare OnChange rule would be appropriate in scenario C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel