New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems PEGAPCSSA87V1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSSA87V1 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 4
[All PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions]

A view has a part number field that requires the first two characters are letters, and the last four are digits (for example, AB1234).

How do you ensure that the correct pattern is entered when the user exits the field?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Mitsue at Jul 08, 2025, 10:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Heike
2 months ago
I’ve always used D for input validation, works like a charm!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
A is too complicated for such a simple validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
3 months ago
I disagree, I think C is more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
3 months ago
Wait, can we really use letters and digits like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
3 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B since it seems to combine both edit and validate rules, which might be the best approach for this pattern check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
4 months ago
I feel like I might have seen something about boolean logic in relation to validate rules, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
4 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar because we practiced referencing edit validate rules in our last session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
4 months ago
I remember we discussed using edit validate rules in class, but I'm not sure if it should be called from a flow action or directly from the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
4 months ago
I've got a good feeling about option C. Referencing an edit validate rule from the property rule seems like the most logical way to handle this type of field validation. I'll make sure to explain my reasoning in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
4 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards A, but I'm not 100% confident. I'll need to double-check the documentation on validate rules and boolean logic to make sure I'm understanding that approach correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between B and C. I'll need to review the details on edit validate rules and how they work with flow actions and property rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Configuring an edit validate rule and referencing it from the property rule for the field seems like the most straightforward way to ensure the correct pattern is entered.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel