Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems PEGAPCSA87V1 Exam - Topic 6 Question 27 Discussion

Apartment tenants submit maintenance requests that specify their name, address, request type, and description of the request. Tenants may submit multiple maintenance requests for different request types. The company wants to identify duplicate maintenance requests from the same address.Which two configurations, when used together on the Search duplicate cases step, achieve this goal? (Choose Two)
A) Configure the request type as a weighted condition.
B) Configure the tenant name as a basic condition.
C) Configure the apartment address as a basic condition.
D) Configure the apartment address as a weighted condition.

Pegasystems PEGAPCSA87V1 Exam - Topic 6 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSA87V1 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 6
[All PEGAPCSA87V1 Questions]

Apartment tenants submit maintenance requests that specify their name, address, request type, and description of the request. Tenants may submit multiple maintenance requests for different request types. The company wants to identify duplicate maintenance requests from the same address.

Which two configurations, when used together on the Search duplicate cases step, achieve this goal? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Kiley at Aug 30, 2023, 06:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCSA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Willard
8 months ago
Can multiple requests from the same tenant really be duplicates?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
8 months ago
B is important too, but I see why C and D work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
8 months ago
Wait, why would you weight the address? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
8 months ago
Totally agree, the address is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
9 months ago
I think C and D are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
9 months ago
I feel like the tenant name might not be as reliable for duplicates since multiple tenants could have the same name, so I’m not sure about that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
9 months ago
Weighted conditions seem to be more effective for distinguishing between different request types, but I can't recall if that applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
9 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where the address was a key factor, so I’m leaning towards configuring it as a basic condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
9 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using the apartment address to identify duplicates, but I'm not sure if it should be a basic or weighted condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
9 months ago
Yeah, I agree with that strategy. Configuring the address as a basic condition and the request type as a weighted condition seems like the way to solve this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
9 months ago
Good point, Avery. I think the best approach is to use both the apartment address as a basic condition and the request type as a weighted condition. That should help us catch any duplicate requests from the same address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. What if a tenant submits multiple requests for different issues? Wouldn't we need to consider the request type as well to identify true duplicates?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
9 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the address, since that's the unique identifier for each tenant. Configuring the apartment address as a basic condition seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
9 months ago
This seems straightforward. I think the answer is B - modifying the Guest access settings in the Microsoft Teams admin center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think Dr. Cline's suggestion of picking every twelfth record feels like it fits the definition of systematic sampling. Could it be called anything else?
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward accounting change question. I think the key is to identify the type of change and then select the appropriate accounting treatment from the list provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
1 year ago
Attention, tenants! From now on, please submit your maintenance requests in triplicate. That way, we can ensure we have two copies of each duplicate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
1 year ago
B and D, baby! Tenant name and weighted address, that's the dream team for duplicate detection.
upvoted 0 times
Sean
1 year ago
Absolutely, using both tenant name and weighted address will help catch any duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
Yes, that's the right combination for identifying duplicate maintenance requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
1 year ago
Great, let's set up the search duplicate cases step with those configurations and see how it works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 year ago
D) Configure the apartment address as a weighted condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
1 year ago
B) Configure the tenant name as a basic condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
1 year ago
I think you're right! Those configurations should definitely help identify duplicate maintenance requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
1 year ago
B and D, baby! Tenant name and weighted address, that's the dream team for duplicate detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dahlia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd go with A and D. Gotta love that weighted address condition! It's like the secret sauce for finding those pesky duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
1 year ago
I think A and D make the most sense too. Weighted conditions are definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
1 year ago
Totally agree, the weighted address condition is key for identifying duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
1 year ago
A and D are the way to go! Weighted conditions for the win.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 year ago
Exactly! Those two configurations together will help identify duplicate maintenance requests from the same address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
1 year ago
D) Configure the apartment address as a weighted condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
1 year ago
A) Configure the request type as a weighted condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
1 year ago
B and C are the way to go. Tenant name and address are the two crucial pieces of information to catch duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
1 year ago
C and D, of course! Apartment address is the key to identifying duplicates, and weighting it makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Nu
1 year ago
It's a smart move to weight the address for better accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
1 year ago
Exactly, focusing on the apartment address is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
1 year ago
D) Configure the apartment address as a weighted condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 year ago
C) Configure the apartment address as a basic condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
1 year ago
But shouldn't we also configure the request type as a weighted condition to ensure accuracy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
1 year ago
I agree with Karol. That way we can easily identify duplicate maintenance requests from the same address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
1 year ago
I think we should configure the apartment address as a basic condition.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel