New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGAPCSA87V1 Exam - Topic 14 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSA87V1 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 14
[All PEGAPCSA87V1 Questions]

An organization has two lines of business: selling books for children and reselling college textbooks. The division selling books for children can use the same basic user interface (Ul) as the division reselling textbooks with the exception of the payment methods. How do you apply the Situational Layer CakeTM in this scenario ?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Pearlie
4 months ago
I like B too, but what if the payment methods change later?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
4 months ago
Definitely A, keeps it simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
4 months ago
Wait, can we really have two payment layers? Sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
4 months ago
I disagree, D seems more organized to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
4 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
5 months ago
I vaguely remember that the base layer should contain common rules, but I’m not sure if we should create a new layer for each division's payment rules or just one. This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to separate UI and payment rules. I think placing the UI rules in the base layer is essential, but I can't recall if we should have a parallel layer or just one for specific payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I feel like the payment methods are quite different, so maybe we need to create separate layers for each division? That makes me lean towards option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how the Situational Layer CakeTM helps in organizing rules based on their specificity. I think option B might be the right choice since it separates generic and specific rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Observability, reusability, and clearly defined architecture - those all seem like important factors for designing a system that's easy to test. I'm guessing the "control" option is the one that's not a consideration for testability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a good one. I think the key is distinguishing between the confidence interval for the average and the range of individual lifts. The 95% confidence interval is about the true average, not necessarily the range of individual campaigns. I'll go with C for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel