Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCSA87V1 Topic 14 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSA87V1 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 14
[All PEGAPCSA87V1 Questions]

Using the following Refund case life cycle, how do you design this case to skip the Item Return stage if the item will not be returned?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Carla at Aug 25, 2024, 12:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCSA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Elsa
21 days ago
Hmm, this question is a real brain-teaser. I'm tempted to go with option C and build a custom retention stage. But then again, my grandma always said, 'Keep it simple, silly!'
upvoted 0 times
Paris
3 days ago
A) Replace the Wait step in the Item Return stage with a Change Stage step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregoria
28 days ago
As an engineer, I'd go with option B. Keep it simple - no need to overcomplicate things when a simple skip will do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Long
20 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herminia
29 days ago
C is a creative approach, adding an alternate stage for item retention. Covers the scenario well, but might be a bit more complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
2 months ago
But wouldn't adding a condition be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
2 months ago
Option D is interesting, adding a decision point to change the stage. That gives more control over the process flow.
upvoted 0 times
Noble
26 days ago
Creating an Item Retention alternate stage could be helpful in defining a process for retaining the item instead of returning it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
29 days ago
Replacing the Wait step in the Item Return stage with a Change Stage step sounds like a practical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
1 months ago
I think adding a condition to skip the Item Return stage when a return is not necessary could also be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
1 months ago
Option D is interesting, adding a decision point to change the stage. That gives more control over the process flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michel
2 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward way to handle this case. Skip the stage when a return is not necessary - simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel