Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCLSA86V2 Topic 1 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCLSA86V2 exam

Question #: 38
Topic #: 1

a performance analysis for an equals-comparisons-only query against a table shows that it always performas a full table scan. the table has grown steadily over time. nothing has been done in the database concerning this table other than it being generated by pega.

Alimit the number of rows fetched from this table,

Badd one or more column indexes to this table.

CExpose one or more columns within this table.

Dalter one or more column types in the table.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D, E

by Wayne at Jun 30, 2024, 05:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCLSA86V2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Graciela

12 months ago

I agree with the others, C seems like the best choice here. Plus, it has a nice ring to it - 'create case smart shape'! What a fun way to solve this problem.

upvoted 0 times

Kaycee

11 months ago

C) Add a create case smart shape to the case life cycle and configure it to be created a case

upvoted 0 times

...

Laura

11 months ago

B) Configure data propagation to map property value between the parent and child cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestina

11 months ago

A) Add a customer split for each process step to the case life cycle and configure it to create child cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kent

1 years ago

I believe using a page list property to store fraudulent claim items is crucial to identify the number of child cases to create.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

1 years ago

Haha, this is a tricky one! I wonder if the test makers are trying to trip us up with all these options. I'm going to go with C as well, just to play it safe.

upvoted 0 times

Marlon

11 months ago

I'm not sure about D, it mentions adding a create case smart setup, but I think C is a safer bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earnestine

11 months ago

I agree, B also seems like a good choice because it talks about configuring data propagation between parent and child cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrinne

11 months ago

I think A is the correct option, it mentions adding a customer split for each process step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brianne

11 months ago

I'm not sure about D, it mentions adding a create case smart setup, but I think C is a safer bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

12 months ago

I agree, B also seems like a good choice because it talks about configuring data propagation between parent and child cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Na

12 months ago

I think A is the correct option, it mentions adding a customer split for each process step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brendan

1 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. D sounds like it could work too, but I'm leaning more towards C since it's specifically mentioned in the question.

upvoted 0 times

Mila

12 months ago

B) configure data propagation to map property value between the parent and clid cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

1 years ago

A) Add a customer split for each process step to the cse life cycle and configure it ti create child cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harrison

1 years ago

I agree with Joesph. Configuring data propagation is also important to map property values.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joesph

1 years ago

I think we need to add a customer split for each process step to create child cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Long

1 years ago

I think the answer is C. Adding a create case smart shape to the case life cycle and configuring it to create child cases seems like the most straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

Melodie

12 months ago

E) Use a page list property to store the fraudulent claim items and identify the number of child cases to create.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephania

1 years ago

A) Add a customer split for each process step to the case life cycle and configure it to create child cases.

upvoted 0 times

...