Pegasystems PEGACPLSA23V1 Exam - Topic 8 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPLSA23V1 exam

Question #: 12
Topic #: 8

[Reporting Design]

As the lead for Pega projects, you are assigned the task of creating a quarterly performance review report for an organization's marketing department. The report should encompass various aspects of their work, such as campaign effectiveness, budget utilization, and team productivity. However, there is a request for detailed data on individual campaigns while maintaining a comprehensive summary of departmental performance. Which of the following is the best reporting design approach for this requirement?

ACreate a report for every quarter with detailed data and then create a yearly report to show the summary of performance of campaigns.

BCreate individual reports for each campaign to ensure detailed analysis, and then a consolidated report for a summary.

CCreate a summary report for the marketing department to show overall performance and a drill-down report containing detailed data on each campaign.

DCreate a report that includes all detailed campaign data within the main report to maintain a comprehensive overview of departmental performance.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Dusti at Nov 19, 2025, 11:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPLSA23V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Bernardine

13 hours ago

Option A would just complicate things with too many reports.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

6 days ago

A yearly summary is too far removed from quarterly performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

11 days ago

Surprised that no one mentioned the workload for option B!

upvoted 0 times

...

Quinn

16 days ago

I think option C is the best! Summary plus drill-down is perfect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

21 days ago

Option B might work, but keeping track of all those individual campaign reports could get messy. C is the clear winner in my book.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

26 days ago

C is definitely the winner here. Gotta love that drill-down functionality to get the best of both worlds.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

1 month ago

Haha, option D would be a nightmare! Cramming all that data into one report? No thanks, I'll pass.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

1 month ago

I’m leaning towards option C as well, since it balances both the summary and the detailed analysis we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

1 month ago

I remember discussing the importance of a comprehensive overview, so option D could be a good choice, but it might get cluttered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

2 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like having separate reports for each campaign might be too much. Maybe option B is overkill?

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquanda

2 months ago

I think option C sounds familiar, like something we practiced in class about summarizing data while allowing for drill-downs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zita

2 months ago

Option A doesn't seem quite right to me. Creating a separate yearly report just for the summary feels like an extra step that might not be necessary. I think the consolidated approach in option C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

2 months ago

I'm leaning towards option C as well. The ability to drill down into the campaign-level details while still maintaining a high-level summary seems like the most balanced approach here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

2 months ago

Option D sounds tempting, but I'm not sure that including all the detailed campaign data in the main report is the best way to go. That could end up being really overwhelming and make it hard to see the overall trends.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

2 months ago

I agree, C is the way to go. Separating the detailed and summary reports makes the most sense for this requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

3 months ago

Option C seems like the best approach. A drill-down report with detailed campaign data would give the necessary granularity while the summary report maintains the high-level overview.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

3 months ago

I disagree, D seems more straightforward for a comprehensive view.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melynda

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Option B seems like it could work, but I'm worried that having individual reports for each campaign might make it harder to get the big picture of departmental performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alida

3 months ago

I think option C is the best approach here. Creating a summary report with a drill-down for detailed campaign data seems like the most efficient way to meet the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...