Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions
- Topic 1: Fundamental principles and concepts of an AI management system: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and covers the basic principles of artificial intelligence, including ethical use, trustworthiness, and transparency. It introduces the purpose and importance of having an AI management system in place for responsible AI governance.
- Topic 2: AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO/IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.
- Topic 3: Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.
- Topic 4: Preparing an ISO/IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.
- Topic 5: Conducting an ISO/IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO/IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.
- Topic 6: Closing an ISO/IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.
- Topic 7: Managing an ISO/IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.
Free PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Actual Questions
Note: Premium Questions for ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor were last updated On Mar. 01, 2026 (see below)
In which situations does an auditor have the right to decline the audit mandate?
Auditors have the right and responsibility to ensure that audits are conducted effectively. According to ISO 19011:2018 and ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, if the audit time allocated is insufficient to conduct a comprehensive and thorough audit, the auditor may refuse or request modification of the assignment.
This helps maintain audit integrity, quality, and professional due care.
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.4 -- Audit duration
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.3.2 -- Audit planning responsibilities
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide -- Chapter: Auditor Rights and Responsibilities
\===========
How does ISO 19011 recommend auditors select audit criteria?
Audit criteria should be selected according to the requirements of the management system standard (e.g., ISO/IEC 42001:2023) and the organization's objectives.
Per ISO 19011:2018 -- Clause 5.4.2, audit criteria must be defined based on standards, statutory requirements, internal policies, procedures, and contractual obligations relevant to the audit.
Random selection or convenience-based criteria are not acceptable in professional audit practice.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 -- Clause 9.2.1 (Internal Audit planning)
PECB Lead Auditor Guide -- Domain 3: ''Defining Audit Criteria and Reference Documents''
[Fundamental Audit Concepts and Principles]
Auditors use the ______ as a benchmark to determine conformity.
[Conducting an ISO/IEC 42001 Audit]
What is the purpose of conducting an opening meeting in the audit process?
[Closing an ISO/IEC 42001 Audit]
Scenario 8:
Scenario 8: InnovateSoft, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a software development company known for its innovative solutions andcommitment to excellence. It specializes in custom software solutions, development, design, testing, maintenance, and consulting,covering both mobile apps and web development. Recently, the company underwent an audit to evaluate the effectiveness and
compliance of its artificial intelligence management system AIMS against ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit team engaged with the auditee to discuss their findings and observations during the audit's final phases. After evaluating theevidence, the audit team presented their audit findings to InnovateSoft, highlighting the identified nonconformities.
Upon receiving the audit findings, InnovateSoft accepted the conclusions but expressed concerns about some findings inaccuratelyreflecting the efficiency of their software development processes. In response, the company provided new evidence and additionalinformation to alter the audit conclusions for a couple of minor nonconformities identified. After thorough consideration, the audit teamleader clarified that the new evidence did not significantly alter the core conclusions drawn for the nonconformities. Therefore, thecertification body issued a certification recommendation conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans without a prior visit.
InnovateSoft accepted the decision of the certification body. The top management of the company also sought suggestions from theaudit team on resolving the identified nonconformities. The audit team leader offered solutions to address the issues, fostering acollaborative effort between the auditors and InnovateSoft.During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics to enhance transparency. They clarified to InnovateSoft that the auditevidence was based on a sample, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty. The method and time frame of reporting and grading findingswere discussed to provide a structured overview of nonconformities. The certification body's process for handling nonconformities,including potential consequences, guided InnovateSoft on corrective actions. The time frame for presenting a plan for correction was
communicated, emphasizing urgency. Insights into the certification body's post-audit activities were provided, ensuring ongoing support.
Lastly, the audit team briefed InnovateSoft on complaint and appeal handling.
InnovateSoft submitted the action plans for each nonconformity separately, describing only the detected issues and the correctiveactions planned to address the detected nonconformities. However, the submission slightly exceeded the specified period of 45 days setby the certification body, arriving three days later. InnovateSoft explained this by attributing the delay to unexpected challengesencountered during the compilation of the action plans.
Was the audit team leader's attitude appropriate regarding the new evidence provided by the company?
- Select Question Types you want
- Set your Desired Pass Percentage
- Allocate Time (Hours : Minutes)
- Create Multiple Practice tests with Limited Questions
- Customer Support
Louann
2 days agoGladys
9 days agoVashti
17 days agoWilda
25 days agoEstrella
1 month agoCyril
1 month agoFelton
2 months agoKanisha
2 months agoDanica
2 months agoLilli
2 months agoMaybelle
3 months agoLuis
3 months agoCharlesetta
3 months agoDomonique
3 months agoArleen
4 months agoZona
4 months agoFrederic
4 months agoYoulanda
4 months agoWenona
5 months agoHubert
5 months agoSkye
5 months agoDesmond
5 months agoGianna
6 months agoRodolfo
6 months agoVincent
6 months agoAdolph
6 months agoTracie
8 months agoRyan
9 months agoRana
10 months agoCarma
11 months agoFairy
11 months ago