MENU
After drafting the audit conclusions, the work documents of the audit team leader were reviewed by another auditor selected by the certification body. Is this acceptable?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Yes, it is acceptable for the work documents of the audit team leader to be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions. This is part of the quality control and assurance processes within the audit to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the audit conclusions.
40 comments · newest first
DE
Dell
10 months ago
Hmm, I’m surprised this is even a question. Isn’t it obvious?
JO
Joanne
11 months ago
Totally agree, it's good to have checks in place!
VE
Vernell
11 months ago
I thought it was always before the conclusions, right?
FR
Francesco
11 months ago
Wait, so they review after the conclusions? That seems off.
AN
Antonio
11 months ago
Definitely acceptable, peer reviews are standard practice!
TI
Tish
12 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen similar questions where the review process was highlighted. I think it’s important to have checks in place, so maybe B is the right choice.
VA
Valda
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought the team leader could review their own work, but I also recall something about needing a second opinion.
ED
Eden
12 months ago
I remember a practice question where the review was emphasized as a critical step before finalizing conclusions. So, I lean towards option B.
JU
Justa
1 year ago
I think the review should happen before the conclusions are made, but I'm not entirely sure. It feels like a timing issue.
AL
Alysa
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the difference between options B and C. I'll need to re-read the question and think through the audit process step-by-step to make sure I select the right answer.
CA
Carey
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking if it's acceptable for another auditor to review the audit team leader's work documents after the audit conclusions have been drafted. Based on my understanding, option A is the correct answer.
TR
Truman
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the proper sequence of the audit review.
AU
Audry
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the audit review process. I'll read through the options carefully and think about the key requirements.
LE
Leslie
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option A - Azure Availability Zones with an active/passive deployment. That seems to best meet the requirements for automatic failover and cost-effectiveness.
FE
Felicidad
2 years ago
Oh man, this is the kind of question that keeps me up at night. *chuckles* But for real, I think A is the way to go. Gotta keep those auditors on their toes!
SA
Santos
2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards B, but A is a close second. Wouldn't want the auditor to have too much power, you know?
MA
Maryann
2 years ago
C) No, it is only the audit team leader that reviews the work documents of each auditor
YE
Yesenia
2 years ago
C) No, it is only the audit team leader that reviews the work documents of each auditor
MO
Moon
2 years ago
A) I agree, having another auditor review the work documents adds an extra layer of assurance
LE
Leontine
2 years ago
A) I agree, having another auditor review the work documents adds an extra layer of assurance
KI
Kimberely
2 years ago
B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion
TH
Thersa
2 years ago
B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion
MI
Michael
2 years ago
A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions
GA
Galen
2 years ago
A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions
JA
Jacquelyne
2 years ago
A) I agree with Kimi, having another auditor review the work documents of the audit team leader adds an extra layer of assurance.
FR
Francine
2 years ago
I'm going to have to go with A. Gotta have that extra pair of eyes to catch any mistakes or oversights.
IL
Ilene
2 years ago
C) No, it is only the audit team leader that reviews the work documents of each auditor
FA
Farrah
2 years ago
A) I agree, it's important to have a second set of eyes to ensure accuracy
JO
Johnetta
2 years ago
B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion
LE
Leandro
2 years ago
A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions
SE
Selma
2 years ago
B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion.
CL
Clemencia
2 years ago
Option C doesn't make any sense. Why would the audit team leader review their own work? That's just asking for trouble!
KI
Kimi
2 years ago
A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions.
LA
Lawanda
2 years ago
B seems more logical to me. Shouldn't the review happen before the final conclusions are reached?
TR
Troy
2 years ago
B seems more logical to me. Shouldn't the review happen before the final conclusions are reached?
PE
Peggy
2 years ago
B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion
CH
Chantell
2 years ago
A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions
JE
Jessenia
2 years ago
I think option A is correct. It's important to have an independent review of the audit team leader's work to ensure the conclusions are sound.
FI
Fidelia
2 years ago
I agree, having a second set of eyes on the audit conclusions is crucial for accuracy.
TI
Titus
2 years ago
A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions