PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 6 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 6

[All ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions]

After drafting the audit conclusions, the work documents of the audit team leader were reviewed by another auditor selected by the certification body. Is this acceptable?

AYes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions

BNo, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion

CNo' it is only the audit team leader that reviews the work documents of each auditor

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Yes, it is acceptable for the work documents of the audit team leader to be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions. This is part of the quality control and assurance processes within the audit to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the audit conclusions.

by Glory at Sep 17, 2024, 04:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dell

3 months ago

Hmm, I’m surprised this is even a question. Isn’t it obvious?

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanne

3 months ago

Totally agree, it's good to have checks in place!

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernell

3 months ago

I thought it was always before the conclusions, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

4 months ago

Wait, so they review after the conclusions? That seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

4 months ago

Definitely acceptable, peer reviews are standard practice!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tish

4 months ago

I feel like I’ve seen similar questions where the review process was highlighted. I think it’s important to have checks in place, so maybe B is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valda

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused. I thought the team leader could review their own work, but I also recall something about needing a second opinion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

4 months ago

I remember a practice question where the review was emphasized as a critical step before finalizing conclusions. So, I lean towards option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

5 months ago

I think the review should happen before the conclusions are made, but I'm not entirely sure. It feels like a timing issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

5 months ago

I'm a little confused by the difference between options B and C. I'll need to re-read the question and think through the audit process step-by-step to make sure I select the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

5 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The question is asking if it's acceptable for another auditor to review the audit team leader's work documents after the audit conclusions have been drafted. Based on my understanding, option A is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the proper sequence of the audit review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audry

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about the audit review process. I'll read through the options carefully and think about the key requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslie

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards option A - Azure Availability Zones with an active/passive deployment. That seems to best meet the requirements for automatic failover and cost-effectiveness.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

1 year ago

Oh man, this is the kind of question that keeps me up at night. *chuckles* But for real, I think A is the way to go. Gotta keep those auditors on their toes!

upvoted 0 times

...

Santos

1 year ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards B, but A is a close second. Wouldn't want the auditor to have too much power, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Maryann

1 year ago

C) No, it is only the audit team leader that reviews the work documents of each auditor

upvoted 0 times

...

Yesenia

1 year ago

C) No, it is only the audit team leader that reviews the work documents of each auditor

upvoted 0 times

...

Moon

1 year ago

A) I agree, having another auditor review the work documents adds an extra layer of assurance

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

1 year ago

A) I agree, having another auditor review the work documents adds an extra layer of assurance

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

1 year ago

B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

1 year ago

B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion

upvoted 0 times

...

Michael

1 year ago

A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

1 year ago

A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

1 year ago

A) I agree with Kimi, having another auditor review the work documents of the audit team leader adds an extra layer of assurance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

1 year ago

I'm going to have to go with A. Gotta have that extra pair of eyes to catch any mistakes or oversights.

upvoted 0 times

Ilene

1 year ago

C) No, it is only the audit team leader that reviews the work documents of each auditor

upvoted 0 times

...

Farrah

1 year ago

A) I agree, it's important to have a second set of eyes to ensure accuracy

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

1 year ago

B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion

upvoted 0 times

...

Leandro

1 year ago

A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

1 year ago

B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clemencia

1 year ago

Option C doesn't make any sense. Why would the audit team leader review their own work? That's just asking for trouble!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimi

1 year ago

A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawanda

1 year ago

B seems more logical to me. Shouldn't the review happen before the final conclusions are reached?

upvoted 0 times

Troy

1 year ago

B seems more logical to me. Shouldn't the review happen before the final conclusions are reached?

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggy

1 year ago

B) No, the work of the audit team leader must be reviewed before reaching an audit conclusion

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantell

1 year ago

A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions

upvoted 0 times

...

Jessenia

1 year ago

I think option A is correct. It's important to have an independent review of the audit team leader's work to ensure the conclusions are sound.

upvoted 0 times

Fidelia

1 year ago

I agree, having a second set of eyes on the audit conclusions is crucial for accuracy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Titus

1 year ago

A) Yes, the work documents of the audit team leader must be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions

upvoted 0 times

...