New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 1 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 1
[All ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions]

During a Stage 1 audit opening meeting, the Management System Representative (MSR) asks to extend the audit scope to include a new site overseas which they have expanded into since the certification application was made.

Select two options for how the auditor should respond.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E, F

According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), control A.5.29 requires an organization to establish and maintain a business continuity management process to ensure the continued availability of information and information systems at the required level following disruptive incidents1.The organization should identify and prioritize critical information assets and processes, assess the risks and impacts of disruptive incidents, develop and implement business continuity plans (BCPs), test and review the BCPs, and ensure that relevant parties are aware of their roles and responsibilities1. Therefore, when verifying the information security of the business continuity management process, an ISMS auditor should verify that these aspects are met in accordance with the audit criteria.

Three options that will be in the audit trail for verifying control A.5.29 are:

Collect more evidence on how the organisation manages information security on mobile devices and during teleworking (Relevant to control A.6.7): This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the organization has implemented appropriate controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information and information systems when staff work from home using mobile devices, such as laptops, tablets or smartphones.This is related to control A.6.7, which requires an organization to establish a policy and procedures for teleworking and use of mobile devices1.

Collect more evidence on how and when the Business Continuity Plan has been tested (Relevant to control A.5.29): This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the organization has tested and reviewed the BCPs to ensure their effectiveness and suitability for different scenarios, such as a pandemic.This is related to control A.5.29, which requires an organization to test and review the BCPs at planned intervals or when significant changes occur1.

Collect more evidence on how the organisation makes sure only staff with a negative test result can enter the organisation (Relevant to control A.7.2): This option is relevant because it can provide evidence of how the organization has implemented appropriate controls to prevent or reduce the risk of infection or transmission of diseases among staff or residents, such as requiring regular staff self-testing and using a health status app.This is related to control A.7.2, which requires an organization to ensure that all employees and contractors are aware of information security threats and concerns, their responsibilities and liabilities, and are equipped to support organizational policies and procedures in this respect1.

The other options are not relevant to verifying control A.5.29, as they are not related to the control or its requirements. For example:

Collect more evidence by interviewing more staff about their feeling about working from home (Relevant to clause 4.2): This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a business continuity management process or ensured the continued availability of information and information systems following disruptive incidents. It may be related to clause 4.2, which requires an organization to understand the needs and expectations of interested parties, but not specifically to control A.5.29.

Collect more evidence on what resources the organisation provides to support the staff working from home (Relevant to clause 7.1): This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a business continuity management process or ensured the continued availability of information and information systems following disruptive incidents. It may be related to clause 7.1, which requires an organization to determine and provide the resources needed for its ISMS, but not specifically to control A.5.29.

Collect more evidence on how the organisation performs a business risk assessment to evaluate how fast the existing residents can be discharged from the nursing home (Relevant to clause 6): This option is not relevant because it does not provide evidence of how the organization has established and maintained a business continuity management process or ensured the continued availability of information and information systems following disruptive incidents. It may be related to clause 6, which requires an organization to plan actions to address risks and opportunities for its ISMS, but not specifically to control A.5.29.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kendra
3 months ago
B is the safest choice. Stick to the original plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
3 months ago
E seems too easy. There must be more to it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
3 months ago
I'm not sure about D. How can we audit a site we haven't planned for?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
4 months ago
Totally agree with A! Can't just change things on the fly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
4 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense. Procedures are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
4 months ago
I think option A makes sense because it mentions established procedures, but I wonder if that would delay the audit process too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
4 months ago
I feel like advising the MSR to cancel the contract and reapply seems a bit extreme, but I can't recall if that's ever the right approach. Maybe option C is too harsh?
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the auditor had to assess if the new site was covered by the existing management system. I think option D could be a valid response too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
5 months ago
I remember that the audit scope is usually based on the initial application, so I think option B might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
5 months ago
I'm confident I can handle this. I'll explain to the MSR that while the scope can be expanded, there are established procedures that need to be followed. That way, we can address the new site while still conducting a thorough audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
5 months ago
I think the best approach here is to advise the MSR that an extension can be incorporated, but it will need to go through the proper channels. Maintaining the integrity of the audit process is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to determine if the new site's processes are already covered under the existing management system. If so, I can just proceed with the audit as planned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to think through the implications of expanding the scope versus sticking to the original plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the established procedures for scope extensions to make sure I respond appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
This is a good question to test our knowledge of XSOAR's indicator management features. I'm confident I can figure this out, but I'll make sure to read the options thoroughly before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
5 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. Is a functional structure the same as a job-based structure? I'm not totally sure about the differences between these organizational systems. Might need to review my notes before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
9 months ago
I'd go with A and D. The auditor needs to be proactive, but also flexible. Gotta keep those auditees happy, you know? Except for the one who tried to bribe me with a lifetime supply of paperclips. That guy, not so much.
upvoted 0 times
Eliseo
8 months ago
D) Definitely, it's important to ensure everything is covered in the audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
8 months ago
A) Sounds like a good plan. Gotta follow the procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
9 months ago
D) Determine whether the Management System covers the processes at the new site and, if so, proceed with the audit
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
9 months ago
A) Advise the MSR that an extension of the scope may be incorporated but will have to go through established procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Owen
10 months ago
Oh man, this reminds me of that time my boss wanted me to audit the new warehouse on the moon. I told him, 'Dude, we're still working on getting the paperwork right for the one down the street!'
upvoted 0 times
Fausto
9 months ago
D) Determine whether the Management System covers the processes at the new site and, if so, proceed with the audit
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
9 months ago
B) Advise the MSR that the audit scope has been determined based on their initial application so the audit has to proceed as planned
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
9 months ago
A) Advise the MSR that an extension of the scope may be incorporated but will have to go through established procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janet
10 months ago
Hmm, B and F seem like the most appropriate responses. The auditor can't just change the scope on the fly, they have to follow the established process. And they should confirm the revised scope with the auditee.
upvoted 0 times
Mireya
9 months ago
F) Confirm that the auditor will advise the auditee that the audit scope will be revised to include the new work area
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
9 months ago
B) Advise the MSR that the audit scope has been determined based on their initial application so the audit has to proceed as planned
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edelmira
10 months ago
Well, this is a tricky one. I'd say the best options are A and D - the auditor should advise the MSR about the procedures for scope extension, but also determine if the new site is already covered by the management system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
11 months ago
I believe the auditor should determine whether the Management System covers the processes at the new site and proceed with the audit if it does.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
11 months ago
I agree with Patrick. It's important to follow the proper procedures when expanding the audit scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
11 months ago
I think the auditor should advise the MSR that an extension of the scope may be incorporated but will have to go through established procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel