New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-31000-Lead-Risk-Manager Exam - Topic 4 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-31000-Lead-Risk-Manager exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 4
[All ISO-31000-Lead-Risk-Manager Questions]

What should an organization consider when selecting the most appropriate risk treatment option(s)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is C. The balance between potential benefits in achieving the objectives and costs, effort, or disadvantages of implementation. ISO 31000 emphasizes that risk treatment decisions should be proportionate, informed, and value-focused.

Selecting risk treatment options requires evaluating trade-offs. Organizations must consider how much a treatment option contributes to achieving objectives while also assessing its costs, resource requirements, operational impact, and potential disadvantages. This balanced approach ensures that risk management protects and creates value rather than imposing unnecessary burdens.

Option A is incorrect because focusing solely on cost ignores effectiveness and value creation. Option B is equally flawed, as ignoring costs and effort may lead to unsustainable or impractical solutions. Option D contradicts ISO 31000's emphasis on feasibility, proportionality, and alignment with context.

From a PECB ISO 31000 Lead Risk Manager perspective, effective risk treatment is about making informed choices, not automatically selecting the most aggressive option. Therefore, the correct answer is balancing benefits with costs, effort, and disadvantages.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Justa
5 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that emphasized the feasibility of options, which makes me lean towards C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
10 days ago
I think we discussed how it's important to weigh both benefits and costs, so maybe C is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
15 days ago
I've got this one! The answer is C. You have to balance the upsides and downsides of each risk treatment option to select the best one. Anything else would be short-sighted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
20 days ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Do we really need to consider all the potential benefits, or can we just focus on the most important ones? I'm not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
26 days ago
Definitely C. You can't just look at the costs or the benefits in isolation - you need to weigh them against each other to find the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
1 month ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I should focus on just the costs and resources or the potential benefits. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
1 month ago
I think the answer is C. You need to consider the balance between the potential benefits and the costs/effort required to implement the risk treatment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel