Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-31000-Lead-Risk-Manager Exam - Topic 2 Question 10 Discussion

Posted by Alica on May 11, 2026 at 03:12 PM

What should an organization consider when selecting the most appropriate risk treatment option(s)?

Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is C. The balance between potential benefits in achieving the objectives and costs, effort, or disadvantages of implementation. ISO 31000 emphasizes that risk treatment decisions should be proportionate, informed, and value-focused.

Selecting risk treatment options requires evaluating trade-offs. Organizations must consider how much a treatment option contributes to achieving objectives while also assessing its costs, resource requirements, operational impact, and potential disadvantages. This balanced approach ensures that risk management protects and creates value rather than imposing unnecessary burdens.

Option A is incorrect because focusing solely on cost ignores effectiveness and value creation. Option B is equally flawed, as ignoring costs and effort may lead to unsustainable or impractical solutions. Option D contradicts ISO 31000's emphasis on feasibility, proportionality, and alignment with context.

From a PECB ISO 31000 Lead Risk Manager perspective, effective risk treatment is about making informed choices, not automatically selecting the most aggressive option. Therefore, the correct answer is balancing benefits with costs, effort, and disadvantages.


Get Premium ISO-31000-Lead-Risk-Manager Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
22 comments · newest first
VI
Vicky 2 days ago
Agreed, C considers both benefits and costs.
DE
Denae 7 days ago
I think C is the best choice. Balance is key.
LE
Leota 12 days ago
B ignores costs. Can't just focus on benefits!
AH
Ahmad 17 days ago
C covers everything. Benefits and costs together.
WI
William 23 days ago
D sounds risky. Feasibility is crucial!
LI
Lindsey 28 days ago
A is too narrow. We need to think broader.
CH
Christene 1 month ago
Agreed, C makes sense. Costs matter too.
TR
Trevor 1 month ago
I think C is the best choice. Balance is key!
ER
Erick 1 month ago
A is too narrow, can't ignore benefits!
NI
Niesha 2 months ago
D is unrealistic, feasibility matters!
PE
Peggy 2 months ago
Wait, eliminating all risks? Sounds too good to be true.
KE
Kenneth 2 months ago
Definitely C! Balance is key.
GW
Gwenn 2 months ago
Gotta weigh costs and benefits together, right?
PA
Paris 2 months ago
D seems unrealistic, feasibility matters too!
SH
Shawn 2 months ago
Totally agree with C, makes the most sense!
MA
Marlon 3 months ago
Wait, can you really ignore costs? Sounds risky.
BE
Bethanie 3 months ago
Definitely C! Balance is key.
GE
Georgene 3 months ago
Gotta weigh costs and benefits, right?
WI
William 3 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think C makes the most sense since it talks about balancing everything, which is what we learned about in risk management.
BE
Benedict 3 months ago
I feel like we might have covered this in class, and I recall that just focusing on costs or benefits alone isn't enough, so A and B seem off.
ES
Estrella 4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that emphasized the importance of feasibility, which makes me lean away from D.
VE
Veronique 5 months ago
I think we discussed how it's important to weigh both benefits and costs, so maybe C is the right choice?
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel