Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO 22301 Lead Implementer Exam - Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO 22301 Lead Implementer exam

Question #: 13
Topic #: 3

[All ISO 22301 Lead Implementer Questions]

Which of the following can be used as a performance indicator to evaluate the performance of the BCMS?

AThe number of employees in the organization.

BThe average cost of a disruption.

CThe percentage of the assets damaged within a timeframe.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Roslyn at Jun 11, 2025, 05:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO 22301 Lead Implementer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Junita

7 months ago

Percentage of assets damaged is crucial for evaluation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

7 months ago

I disagree, the number of employees matters too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

7 months ago

Wait, can the number of employees really be a performance indicator?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

7 months ago

Definitely, the average cost is the best metric here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

8 months ago

The average cost of a disruption is a solid indicator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonor

8 months ago

I’m a bit confused about which one is the best indicator. I thought all three could relate to performance in some way.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolland

8 months ago

The percentage of assets damaged sounds familiar; I feel like we practiced a question similar to this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

8 months ago

I think the average cost of a disruption could be a solid indicator, but I can't recall if we covered that in detail.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

9 months ago

I remember discussing performance indicators in class, but I'm not sure if the number of employees really reflects BCMS performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

9 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about the percentage of assets damaged. That could be an indicator, but it might not tell the whole story about BCMS performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

9 months ago

Okay, I think the average cost of a disruption makes the most sense as a performance indicator. That would show how effective the BCMS is at minimizing the impact of incidents.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fatima

9 months ago

The number of employees doesn't seem relevant - I'm pretty sure the question is looking for something more specific to business continuity. Let me re-read the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

9 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about what metrics would actually evaluate the performance of a BCMS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remona

12 months ago

The average cost of a disruption makes the most sense to me. It's the bottom line that really matters, and that's what the BCMS is all about - protecting the business from financial impact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gennie

12 months ago

Haha, I bet the person who came up with 'number of employees' was just trying to pad out the answer choices. Gotta love those exam writers and their creative ways to confuse us.

upvoted 0 times

Nichelle

11 months ago

B) The average cost of a disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hildred

11 months ago

A) The number of employees in the organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Oliva

12 months ago

The number of employees? Really? That's just the size of the organization, not how well the BCMS is working. Talk about a useless metric.

upvoted 0 times

Carrol

11 months ago

C) The percentage of the assets damaged within a timeframe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Art

11 months ago

B) The average cost of a disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Shaun

1 year ago

I don't know, the percentage of assets damaged could be a better way to see how well the BCMS is protecting the critical infrastructure. That's a more direct measure of performance.

upvoted 0 times

Alease

11 months ago

C) The percentage of the assets damaged within a timeframe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noble

11 months ago

B) The average cost of a disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

12 months ago

A) The number of employees in the organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Louis

1 year ago

The average cost of a disruption seems like a pretty good performance indicator to me. That's where the real impact on the business is felt, right?

upvoted 0 times

Walker

12 months ago

C) The percentage of the assets damaged within a timeframe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gertude

12 months ago

Yes, that makes sense. It directly shows the financial impact of any disruptions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jin

1 year ago

B) The average cost of a disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Twanna

1 year ago

But what about the percentage of assets damaged? That could also be a good indicator, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

1 year ago

I agree with Sharika, the cost of disruptions can show how effective the BCMS is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

1 year ago

I think the average cost of a disruption can be a good performance indicator.

upvoted 0 times

...