Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 3 Question 8 Discussion

The purpose of risk management for business continuity is to find out what problems an organization may face.How should the level of risk for an organization be determined?
A) Combining consequence and likelihood of events
B) Combining importance and acceptance of events
C) Combining acceptable and tolerable events
D) Combining profitability and analysis of events

PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 3 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-22301-Lead-Auditor exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 3
[All ISO-22301-Lead-Auditor Questions]

The purpose of risk management for business continuity is to find out what problems an organization may face.

How should the level of risk for an organization be determined?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lonna at May 04, 2022, 05:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-22301-Lead-Auditor Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Crissy
8 months ago
I’m surprised there’s no option for just analyzing past incidents!
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
8 months ago
Wait, combining profitability? That seems off...
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
8 months ago
A is the way to go! It’s all about understanding the risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
8 months ago
I think B could work too, but it’s not as clear-cut.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
8 months ago
Definitely A! Consequence and likelihood make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the terms used in these options. I don’t remember "acceptable" and "tolerable" being key factors in our discussions. Is option C even a thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
9 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it was about weighing risks based on their impact and probability. That sounds like option A again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think we might have discussed the importance of how events are accepted by stakeholders too. Maybe option B could be relevant?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
9 months ago
I remember we talked about how risk is often assessed by looking at both the likelihood of an event and its potential consequences. So, I think option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
9 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward YANG-push question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the key elements required for establishing a subscription.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
9 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a CLI command question. I think the key is to find the right Splunk command to view the forwarder to indexer configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
10 months ago
I keep getting 4000 units stuck in my head, but I feel like that might be too high based on what we covered.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel