Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

PCI QSA_New_V4 Exam - Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for PCI's QSA_New_V4 exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 5

[All QSA_New_V4 Questions]

The Intent of assigning a risk ranking to vulnerabilities Is to?

AEnsure all vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

BReplace the need for quarterly ASV scans.

CPrioritize the highest risk items so they can be addressed more quickly.

DEnsure that critical security patches are installed at least quarterly

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Intent of Risk Ranking

PCI DSS Requirement 6.3.2 requires that entities assign a risk ranking to vulnerabilities to prioritize remediation efforts.

This ensures that the most critical vulnerabilities are addressed in a timely manner, reducing the risk to the CDE.

Practical Implementation

Vulnerabilities are assessed based on potential impact and likelihood of exploitation, typically using industry-standard frameworks like CVSS.

High-risk vulnerabilities may require immediate attention, while lower-priority issues are remediated per schedule.

Incorrect Options

Option A: PCI DSS does not mandate a 30-day remediation window for all vulnerabilities; remediation timelines depend on risk.

Option B: Quarterly ASV scans are still required even with risk ranking.

Option D: Installing patches quarterly does not align with the dynamic prioritization of risks.

by Blossom at Feb 10, 2025, 06:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium QSA_New_V4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Armando

10 months ago

C is definitely the right choice, gotta tackle the big threats first!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyra

10 months ago

I think option A is too strict, not all can be fixed in 30 days.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

10 months ago

Wait, are we really saying we can skip ASV scans?

upvoted 0 times

...

Coletta

10 months ago

Totally agree, option C makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

10 months ago

It's all about prioritizing risks!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodney

11 months ago

I vaguely recall something about quarterly scans, but I don't think risk ranking replaces them. It seems more focused on prioritization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

11 months ago

I’m a bit confused; I thought risk ranking was also about ensuring all vulnerabilities are fixed within a certain timeframe, but that might be more about compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorita

11 months ago

I remember a practice question that emphasized prioritizing high-risk items, so I feel like option C makes the most sense here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

11 months ago

I think the main goal of risk ranking is to prioritize vulnerabilities, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about addressing them quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

11 months ago

Ah, I see what they're getting at. Risk ranking is all about focusing resources on the highest-risk items, not just ensuring everything is fixed within a certain timeframe. I'll go with C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mirta

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to recognize that risk ranking is used to prioritize the most critical vulnerabilities so they can be addressed more quickly. Option C looks like the best answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I grasp the concept of risk ranking and how it's used to prioritize vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

11 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about risk management. I'll focus on understanding the intent behind risk ranking to determine the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

2 years ago

As a security professional, I have to go with C. It's all about making the best use of limited resources.

upvoted 0 times

Glenn

1 year ago

C is definitely the way to go in order to maximize our efforts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 year ago

It's a strategic approach to managing security risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

1 year ago

It definitely helps in making sure we address the most critical vulnerabilities first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shasta

1 year ago

I agree, prioritizing the highest risk items is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Pete

2 years ago

Haha, B is a good one. Trying to replace ASV scans with risk ranking? Yeah, that's not happening!

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

2 years ago

I agree with C. It just makes sense to focus on the high-risk items first instead of trying to address everything at once.

upvoted 0 times

Eveline

1 year ago

Agreed, focusing on the highest risk items first can help prevent major security breaches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisbeth

1 year ago

I think C is the best option too. It's important to prioritize the most critical vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Onita

2 years ago

But shouldn't we also ensure that critical security patches are installed regularly?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lou

2 years ago

I agree with Brett, it helps in addressing critical vulnerabilities more quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brett

2 years ago

I think the intent is to prioritize the highest risk items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

2 years ago

Definitely C. Prioritizing the most critical vulnerabilities is the key to an effective vulnerability management program.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miesha

2 years ago

I think C is the correct answer. The whole point of risk ranking is to prioritize the highest risk vulnerabilities so they can be addressed more quickly.

upvoted 0 times

Franchesca

2 years ago

Yes, it helps focus on what needs to be fixed first to improve overall security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

2 years ago

I agree, prioritizing the highest risk items is key to addressing vulnerabilities efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

...