Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PCI QSA_New_V4 Exam - Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for PCI's QSA_New_V4 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 5
[All QSA_New_V4 Questions]

The Intent of assigning a risk ranking to vulnerabilities Is to?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Intent of Risk Ranking

PCI DSS Requirement 6.3.2 requires that entities assign a risk ranking to vulnerabilities to prioritize remediation efforts.

This ensures that the most critical vulnerabilities are addressed in a timely manner, reducing the risk to the CDE.

Practical Implementation

Vulnerabilities are assessed based on potential impact and likelihood of exploitation, typically using industry-standard frameworks like CVSS.

High-risk vulnerabilities may require immediate attention, while lower-priority issues are remediated per schedule.

Incorrect Options

Option A: PCI DSS does not mandate a 30-day remediation window for all vulnerabilities; remediation timelines depend on risk.

Option B: Quarterly ASV scans are still required even with risk ranking.

Option D: Installing patches quarterly does not align with the dynamic prioritization of risks.


by Blossom at Feb 10, 2025, 06:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium QSA_New_V4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Armando
4 months ago
C is definitely the right choice, gotta tackle the big threats first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
4 months ago
I think option A is too strict, not all can be fixed in 30 days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
Wait, are we really saying we can skip ASV scans?
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
4 months ago
Totally agree, option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
4 months ago
It's all about prioritizing risks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
5 months ago
I vaguely recall something about quarterly scans, but I don't think risk ranking replaces them. It seems more focused on prioritization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought risk ranking was also about ensuring all vulnerabilities are fixed within a certain timeframe, but that might be more about compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
5 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized prioritizing high-risk items, so I feel like option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
5 months ago
I think the main goal of risk ranking is to prioritize vulnerabilities, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about addressing them quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Risk ranking is all about focusing resources on the highest-risk items, not just ensuring everything is fixed within a certain timeframe. I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to recognize that risk ranking is used to prioritize the most critical vulnerabilities so they can be addressed more quickly. Option C looks like the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I grasp the concept of risk ranking and how it's used to prioritize vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about risk management. I'll focus on understanding the intent behind risk ranking to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
As a security professional, I have to go with C. It's all about making the best use of limited resources.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
11 months ago
C is definitely the way to go in order to maximize our efforts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
11 months ago
It's a strategic approach to managing security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
12 months ago
It definitely helps in making sure we address the most critical vulnerabilities first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
12 months ago
I agree, prioritizing the highest risk items is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
1 year ago
Haha, B is a good one. Trying to replace ASV scans with risk ranking? Yeah, that's not happening!
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
1 year ago
I agree with C. It just makes sense to focus on the high-risk items first instead of trying to address everything at once.
upvoted 0 times
Eveline
12 months ago
Agreed, focusing on the highest risk items first can help prevent major security breaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
12 months ago
I think C is the best option too. It's important to prioritize the most critical vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Onita
1 year ago
But shouldn't we also ensure that critical security patches are installed regularly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
1 year ago
I agree with Brett, it helps in addressing critical vulnerabilities more quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
1 year ago
I think the intent is to prioritize the highest risk items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
Definitely C. Prioritizing the most critical vulnerabilities is the key to an effective vulnerability management program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer. The whole point of risk ranking is to prioritize the highest risk vulnerabilities so they can be addressed more quickly.
upvoted 0 times
Franchesca
1 year ago
Yes, it helps focus on what needs to be fixed first to improve overall security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
1 year ago
I agree, prioritizing the highest risk items is key to addressing vulnerabilities efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel