Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam SSE-Engineer Topic 2 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's SSE-Engineer exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 2
[All SSE-Engineer Questions]

Which policy configuration in Prisma Access Browser (PAB) will protect an organization from malicious BYOD and minimize the impact on the user experience?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In Prisma Access Browser (PAB), allowing access to applications while enforcing data masking or watermarking provides security for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) users without heavily impacting the user experience. Data masking ensures that sensitive information is obscured, reducing the risk of data leakage, while watermarking can deter unauthorized screenshots or data exfiltration. This approach balances security and usability, allowing users to work efficiently while protecting corporate data.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Rosendo
1 months ago
Option B, baby! Session recording is the only way to keep an eye on those sneaky BYOD users. Trust no one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 months ago
I agree with Lashonda, data masking or watermarking can protect the organization without impacting user experience too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
1 months ago
Hold up, are we talking about Prisma Access Browser or Prisma Access Blender? I'm so confused right now.
upvoted 0 times
Aretha
28 days ago
User 2: Oh, got it. In that case, the policy configuration that blocks elements like screen scrapers would help protect against malicious BYOD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
30 days ago
User 1: We're talking about Prisma Access Browser, not Blender.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
2 months ago
But wouldn't allowing access to applications with data masking or watermarking be a good compromise?
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the policy that blocks elements like screen scrapers is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
Dude, if you're not blocking file exchange, you're just asking for trouble. Option A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
6 days ago
User 4: True, but blocking screen scrapers is important too to prevent data leaks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
8 days ago
User 3: I think session recording could also be helpful in monitoring activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
17 days ago
User 2: Definitely, it's a major risk if not controlled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
29 days ago
User 1: I agree, blocking file exchange is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gertude
2 months ago
I don't know, man. I'm more of a 'let the users do their thing' kind of guy. Option D sounds like it might be more user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
Hana
18 days ago
User 3: I agree, it's important to find a policy configuration that keeps users happy while still keeping the organization secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
19 days ago
User 2: Yeah, data masking or watermarking could help protect against malicious BYOD without being too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
19 days ago
User 1: I think option D sounds like a good balance between security and user experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go! Blocking those pesky screen scrapers is a must for any serious BYOD policy.
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
30 days ago
User 3: Plus, it ensures a better user experience by minimizing potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it helps protect sensitive information from being stolen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, blocking screen scrapers is crucial for BYOD security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
3 months ago
I think the policy that blocks file exchange would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel