Why are VM-Series firewalls now grouped by four tiers?
The VM-Series tiering simplifies the product portfolio.
Why B is correct: The four-tier model (VE, VE-Lite, VE-Standard, VE-High) simplifies the selection process for customers by grouping VM-Series models based on performance and resource allocation. This makes it easier to choose the appropriate VM-Series instance based on their needs without having to navigate a long list of individual models.
Why A, C, and D are incorrect:
A . To obscure the supported hypervisor manufacturer into generic terms: The tiering is not related to obscuring hypervisor information. The documentation clearly states supported hypervisors.
C . To define the maximum limits for key criteria based on allocated memory: While memory is a factor in performance, the tiers are based on a broader set of resource allocations (vCPUs, memory, throughput) and features, not just memory.
D . To define the priority level of support customers expect when opening a TAC case: Support priority is based on support contracts, not the VM-Series tier.
Palo Alto Networks Reference: VM-Series datasheets and the VM-Series deployment guides explain the tiering model and its purpose of simplifying the portfolio.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!