New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 1 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

A customer requests that a known spyware threat signature be triggered based on a rate of occurrence, for example, 10 hits in 5 seconds.

How is this goal accomplished?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Tiffiny at Dec 11, 2023, 06:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Strata Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Candra
3 months ago
A could work, but it feels a bit complicated for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
3 months ago
D seems right too, but I’m leaning towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
4 months ago
Wait, can we really just ask Palo Alto to change it? Sounds too easy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
4 months ago
Definitely agree with B, makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
4 months ago
I think option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
4 months ago
Submitting a request to Palo Alto Networks seems unlikely to be the right answer; I don't think that's how we handle immediate threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
4 months ago
I feel like configuring the Anti-Spyware profile might be relevant, but I can't recall if it specifically addresses the rate of occurrence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about tracking occurrences, and I think adding a correlation object could be the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
5 months ago
I think we might need to create a custom signature, but I'm not entirely sure how to incorporate the time attribute effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
5 months ago
Option B is definitely the right choice here. Tracking the rate of occurrence and triggering an alert when the threshold is met is exactly what the question is asking for. I feel confident in this approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm thinking option A or D might be the way to go, but I'm not 100% sure. I'll need to review the material on custom signatures and Anti-Spyware profiles again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'd go with option B - adding a correlation object to track the occurrences and trigger an alert when the threshold is reached.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. Is option C even a valid choice? Submitting a request to Palo Alto Networks doesn't seem like it would solve the immediate problem. I'm leaning towards either A or B, but I'll need to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
5 months ago
I think the key here is preventing overrides in sandboxes and production, so option B about the release manager tracking changes seems like a smart approach. That way you have visibility and control over what's being deployed where.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
Alright, time to put my virus knowledge to the test. Gotta remember the key details about each of these options to nail this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
5 months ago
The key here is to use the driver.switchTo().frame() method and pass in the frame ID as the argument. That will change the context of the test script to the specified frame. I'm confident option B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The diagram is clear, and the answer choices seem straightforward. I'll double-check my work, but I think I can nail this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. The DHCP server must not be able to communicate with the DNS server, which would prevent the clients from being able to browse the internet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
10 months ago
Option D all the way! Why make things complicated when you can just configure the profile and be done with it? It's like trying to catch a fly with a bazooka.
upvoted 0 times
Dorian
9 months ago
Exactly, just configure the profile and you're good to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
9 months ago
I agree, no need to overcomplicate things when there's an easy solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. Simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
10 months ago
I agree, no need to overcomplicate things when there's an easy solution available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
10 months ago
Exactly! It's much simpler to just set the rule counts in the Anti-Spyware profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
10 months ago
Option D all the way! Why make things complicated when you can just configure the profile and be done with it?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
10 months ago
Option A sounds a bit too complex for my liking. I'd rather keep things simple and go with the correlation object approach in B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Asking Palo Alto Networks to change the behavior feels like a bit of a cop-out. I'd prefer to handle this in-house if possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
10 months ago
I'd go with D. Configuring the Anti-Spyware profile to match the occurrence frequency seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
10 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to accurately configure the Anti-Spyware profile to match the occurrence frequency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Configure the Anti-Spyware profile with the number of rule counts to match the occurrence frequency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
11 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Tracking the occurrences and triggering above the threshold makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
9 months ago
That sounds like the best option to me too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
9 months ago
B) Add a correlation object that tracks the occurrences and triggers above the desired threshold
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
10 months ago
B) Add a correlation object that tracks the occurrences and triggers above the desired threshold
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
10 months ago
A) Create a custom spyware signature matching the known signature with the time attribute
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlie
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Add a correlation object that tracks the occurrences and triggers above the desired threshold.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
11 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I can see how both options could work in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Configure the Anti-Spyware profile with the number of rule counts to match the occurrence frequency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Add a correlation object that tracks the occurrences and triggers above the desired threshold.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel