New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata Exam - Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

Which two features are found in a Palo Alto Networks NGFW but are absent in a legacy firewall product? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Roosevelt
4 months ago
Wow, I had no idea NGFWs were that advanced!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
4 months ago
Really? I thought some legacy firewalls could do application identification too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
4 months ago
I agree with B and C, legacy firewalls can't keep up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
4 months ago
I think A is also a key feature, but not as critical as B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannie
4 months ago
Definitely B and C! Modern firewalls are way smarter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
5 months ago
I remember that NGFWs can identify applications on any port, so I think C is a strong candidate. But I’m torn between B and D for the second choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
5 months ago
I recall practicing a question similar to this, and I think A is about zones, which is a newer concept in NGFWs. But I’m not completely confident about the second option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
5 months ago
I'm not so sure about the options. I feel like both C and D could be features of legacy firewalls too, but I think C might be more specific to NGFWs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
5 months ago
I think option B is definitely one of the features. I remember studying how NGFWs can match policies based on applications rather than just ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question on route distinguishers. I'm pretty confident I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. What exactly does "containing" a malicious SSID mean, and how would that affect connectivity? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about ensuring network continuity. I think the key is to consider the options and determine which one would best maintain the connection between the LANs and the WAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
5 months ago
Option A seems like a good starting point, using historical data to understand past issues. But I also think the business priorities and SLAs in option C are important to consider. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
5 months ago
I've worked with Azure Databricks before, so I'm confident this statement is accurate. I'll go ahead and select "No change is needed" for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel