Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Questions]

Which use case is valid for Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs) provide robust security features across a variety of use cases. Let's analyze each option:

A . Code-embedded NGFWs provide enhanced IoT security by allowing PAN-OS code to be run on devices that do not support embedded VM images.

This statement is incorrect. NGFWs do not operate as 'code-embedded' solutions for IoT devices. Instead, they protect IoT devices through advanced threat prevention, device identification, and segmentation capabilities.

B . Serverless NGFW code security provides public cloud security for code-only deployments that do not leverage VM instances or containerized services.

This is not a valid use case. Palo Alto NGFWs provide security for public cloud environments using VM-series firewalls, CN-series (containerized firewalls), and Prisma Cloud for securing serverless architectures. NGFWs do not operate in 'code-only' environments.

C . IT/OT segmentation firewalls allow operational technology (OT) resources in plant networks to securely interface with IT resources in the corporate network.

This is a valid use case. Palo Alto NGFWs are widely used in industrial environments to provide IT/OT segmentation, ensuring that operational technology systems in plants or manufacturing facilities can securely communicate with IT networks while protecting against cross-segment threats. Features like App-ID, User-ID, and Threat Prevention are leveraged for this segmentation.

D . PAN-OS GlobalProtect gateways allow companies to run malware and exploit prevention modules on their endpoints without installing endpoint agents.

This is incorrect. GlobalProtect gateways provide secure remote access to corporate networks and extend the NGFW's threat prevention capabilities to endpoints, but endpoint agents are required to enforce malware and exploit prevention modules.

Key Takeaways:

IT/OT segmentation with NGFWs is a real and critical use case in industries like manufacturing and utilities.

The other options describe features or scenarios that are not applicable or valid for NGFWs.


Palo Alto Networks NGFW Use Cases

Industrial Security with NGFWs

Contribute your Thoughts:

Quinn
1 days ago
I guess option A is for IoT geeks who want to run their firewall code on their smart toasters or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
6 days ago
Haha, 'code-embedded NGFWs' in option A? Palo Alto is really pushing the boundaries of firewall innovation here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
7 days ago
Option D seems a bit too good to be true. Endpoint protection without agents? I'm skeptical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
20 days ago
I personally think option D is also valid as it provides endpoint security without the need for additional agents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
20 days ago
I'm not sure about the 'serverless NGFW' concept in option B. Sounds a bit like marketing jargon to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
28 days ago
I agree with Rebecka, option C seems like a practical use case for Palo Alto Networks NGFWs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
1 months ago
Option C seems the most relevant to me. Separating IT and OT networks is crucial for industrial cybersecurity.
upvoted 0 times
Colette
10 days ago
I prefer option D, having malware prevention on endpoints is crucial for overall network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
18 days ago
True, having code-embedded NGFWs can provide an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
20 days ago
I think option A is also important for securing IoT devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
22 days ago
I agree, IT/OT segmentation is essential for protecting critical infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
1 months ago
I think option C is valid because it helps to secure the interface between IT and OT resources.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel