Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-SoftwareFirewall Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Which solution is best for securing an EKS environment?
B) CN-Series high availability (HA) pair
A) API orchestration
C) PA-Series using load sharing
D) VM-Series single host

Palo Alto Networks PSE-SoftwareFirewall Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-SoftwareFirewall exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 4
[All PSE-SoftwareFirewall Questions]

Which solution is best for securing an EKS environment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

CN-Series for EKS Security:

The CN-Series firewalls are specifically designed to secure Kubernetes environments, such as Amazon EKS. Deploying them in a high availability (HA) pair ensures robust, fault-tolerant security for containerized workloads, providing continuous protection and high availability.


Palo Alto Networks CN-Series Deployment Guide

by Elbert at Apr 08, 2026, 08:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-SoftwareFirewall Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Samira
14 hours ago
D seems too limited for EKS. Single host is risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
6 days ago
A could work too, but orchestration alone isn't enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
11 days ago
I agree, B offers redundancy. Can't risk downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
16 days ago
I think B is the best choice. HA is crucial for uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
21 days ago
B definitely has the edge for security and availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
26 days ago
C is interesting, but I prefer the reliability of B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
1 month ago
D seems too limited for a production environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
1 month ago
A could work too, but I feel B is more robust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
1 month ago
I agree, B offers redundancy. Very important for EKS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
2 months ago
I think B is the best choice. HA is crucial for uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
2 months ago
Wait, can a single host really handle EKS? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
2 months ago
I agree with B, high availability is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
2 months ago
Not sure about D, seems too limited for EKS.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
4 months ago
A is definitely the way to go for orchestration!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
4 months ago
I think B is the best choice for HA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
4 months ago
I feel like the VM-Series single host wouldn't provide enough security for an EKS setup, but I need to review that section again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where load sharing was mentioned, but I can't recall if the PA-Series is really suited for EKS environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
5 months ago
I think the CN-Series HA pair might be a solid option, but I need to double-check how it integrates with EKS specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
5 months ago
I remember studying about API orchestration, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice for securing EKS.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel