New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Platform Exam - Topic 1 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Platform Questions]

XYZ Corporation has a legacy environment with asymmetric routing. The customer understands that Palo Alto Networks firewalls can support asymmetric routing with redundancy.

Which two features must be enabled to meet the customer's requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/web-interface-help/device/device-certificate-management-ssl-decryption-exclusion


by Rasheeda at Mar 05, 2025, 04:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Theron
2 months ago
Definitely need both A and C for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
3 months ago
Wait, can you really do that with asymmetric routing? Sounds tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
3 months ago
I disagree, I thought HA active/passive was the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
3 months ago
I think HA active/active is also a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
3 months ago
Gotta enable Policy-based forwarding for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
4 months ago
I recall that virtual systems are more about segmentation, so I’m leaning towards HA active/passive as the second feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like policy-based forwarding might be important for handling asymmetric traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
4 months ago
I think HA active/active is definitely one of the features we need, but I’m a bit confused about the second option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
4 months ago
I remember studying asymmetric routing, but I'm not entirely sure which features are specifically required for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
4 months ago
I've got this! Asymmetric routing needs HA active/active to handle the redundancy. And policy-based forwarding is crucial for the routing logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the Palo Alto documentation to make sure I understand the requirements fully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
5 months ago
Virtual systems and policy-based forwarding - those sound like the right features to enable. I'll mark those two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
5 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about this in class. I think the key is to enable the right high availability (HA) configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the Palo Alto features that support asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
9 months ago
I'm going to go with C) Policy-based forwarding and B) HA active/active. Asymmetric routing needs that flexibility, and active/active HA sounds like a great way to keep things redundant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
10 months ago
C) Policy-based forwarding is a must, but I'm torn between B) HA active/active and D) HA active/passive. Maybe I should flip a coin?
upvoted 0 times
Devora
9 months ago
D) HA active/passive is another option for redundancy in asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
9 months ago
B) HA active/active provides redundancy for asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
9 months ago
A) Virtual systems and C) Policy-based forwarding should be enabled for asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
I'm going with C) Policy-based forwarding and B) HA active/active. Asymmetric routing is all about routing flexibility, and an active/active HA setup provides the redundancy the customer needs.
upvoted 0 times
Bette
8 months ago
That makes sense, those two features combined should meet the customer's requirements for asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
8 months ago
Yes, and B) HA active/active ensures redundancy in case of any failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
9 months ago
I agree with you, C) Policy-based forwarding allows for more flexibility in routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loren
10 months ago
Definitely C) Policy-based forwarding, but I'm not sure about B) HA active/active. Wouldn't D) HA active/passive be a better option for redundancy in this case?
upvoted 0 times
Coleen
8 months ago
Oh, I see. So enabling both features would be the best solution for XYZ Corporation's legacy environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
8 months ago
Actually, both C) Policy-based forwarding and D) HA active/passive are needed for the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
10 months ago
I agree, but I believe HA active/passive would provide better redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
10 months ago
I think C) Policy-based forwarding is necessary for asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawn
10 months ago
C) Policy-based forwarding and B) HA active/active seem like the right choices here. Asymmetric routing requires policy-based forwarding, and redundancy can be achieved with an active/active HA setup.
upvoted 0 times
Earleen
9 months ago
And having active/active HA setup will provide redundancy for the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
9 months ago
Yes, you're correct. Policy-based forwarding is needed for asymmetric routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
10 months ago
I'm not sure about HA active/active and HA active/passive. I think Virtual systems and Policy-based forwarding are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
11 months ago
I agree with Margarett. Virtual systems and Policy-based forwarding make sense for supporting asymmetric routing with redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
11 months ago
I think the correct answers are A) Virtual systems and C) Policy-based forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel