New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Endpoint Exam - Topic 1 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Endpoint exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Endpoint Questions]

An administrator would like to add Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper to the exploit prevention policy for macOS. In order to achieve this task, which option should be added to the macOS protected processes list?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Candida
3 months ago
I’d go with A for a broader approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
3 months ago
Are we sure about B? Sounds too specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
4 months ago
Wait, why not just use option C? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
4 months ago
Definitely agree with B, both need to be added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
4 months ago
I think option B is the most accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards A, but I’m not confident. It seems like it could be too vague for the policy requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
4 months ago
I feel like D is too limited since it only mentions Google Chrome and not the helper. I think we need both in the list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using wildcards in similar questions. Maybe C could be the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
5 months ago
I think the answer might be B since it specifically mentions both Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper, which seems important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not 100% confident, but I'm going to give it my best shot and eliminate the options that don't seem quite right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
5 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing this up, but isn't there something about the "Data-security Act" that focuses on compliance rather than operations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'd go with option C - how much value the task adds. That's the key focus of DevOps, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
5 months ago
Wait, what? Cisco FMC doesn't support IPv4 addresses? That can't be right. I better re-read the question and make sure I understand the requirements correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
10 months ago
I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to troubleshoot a Chrome crash. That would be a real 'helper' headache, if you know what I mean. *laughs*
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
10 months ago
B all the way! We don't want any surprises with those Chrome helpers lurking around. Better safe than sorry, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Charisse
9 months ago
C) chrome*
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
9 months ago
B) google chrome and google chrome helper
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
9 months ago
A) chrome app
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mira
10 months ago
I'm going to have to go with D. Google Chrome is the main executable, so that should do the trick, right?
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
9 months ago
Actually, I think D is the correct option. Google Chrome is the main executable that needs to be added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
9 months ago
I agree with you, B seems like the most comprehensive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
10 months ago
I think B is the best option. It includes both Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
10 months ago
C looks tempting, but I'm worried that the wildcard might catch more processes than intended. Better to be precise with B, I think.
upvoted 0 times
Jettie
9 months ago
Yeah, better to be safe than sorry. B it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
9 months ago
I think B is the best choice to avoid any unintended processes being caught.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
10 months ago
I agree, being precise with B is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jani
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) chrome* might also be a valid option since it includes both Chrome and Chrome Helper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
I agree with Queenie. Adding both Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper to the exploit prevention policy makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper seem like the most specific and comprehensive options here.
upvoted 0 times
Detra
10 months ago
Yes, B is the most specific choice to ensure both applications are included in the exploit prevention policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
10 months ago
I agree, B seems like the best option to cover both Google Chrome and Google Chrome Helper.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queenie
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) google chrome and google chrome helper.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel